Tools & Wizards About Us
classiconlinetest.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 55% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

classiconlinetest.com

精品无码国产免费_亚洲中文字幕另类_中文字幕日韩人妻在线视频_国产 亚洲 中文在线 字幕91

Page Load Speed

886 ms in total

First Response

156 ms

Resources Loaded

582 ms

Page Rendered

148 ms

classiconlinetest.com screenshot

About Website

Visit classiconlinetest.com now to see the best up-to-date Classiconlinetest content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about classiconlinetest.com

中文字幕不卡一区,国产一级欧美一区二区,久久黄色视频,欧美精品v国产精品v日韩精品,99热国产精品五月天,亚洲精品无码鲁网站,99久久精品美女高潮喷水十八,久久96热在国产精品10

Visit classiconlinetest.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Classiconlinetest.com page load time and found that the first response time was 156 ms and then it took 730 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

classiconlinetest.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.243

51/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

classiconlinetest.com

156 ms

bootstrap.css

159 ms

font-awesome.css

113 ms

front-style.css

80 ms

jquery.dataTables.css

114 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Classiconlinetest.com, 19% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (246 ms) belongs to the original domain Classiconlinetest.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 317.2 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

923.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Classiconlinetest.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 893.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 6.4 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 62.5 kB

  • Original 893.8 kB
  • After minification 831.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Classiconlinetest images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 101.5 kB

  • Original 165.8 kB
  • After minification 153.9 kB
  • After compression 64.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 101.5 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 146.6 kB

  • Original 172.4 kB
  • After minification 142.2 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Classiconlinetest.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (39%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classiconlinetest. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

classiconlinetest.com

classiconlinetest.com

156 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

159 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

113 ms

front-style.css

front-style.css

80 ms

jquery.dataTables.css

jquery.dataTables.css

114 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

179 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

131 ms

html5placeholder.jquery.js

html5placeholder.jquery.js

178 ms

css

css

15 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

52 ms

hedder-bg.jpg

hedder-bg.jpg

58 ms

exam_banner.jpg

exam_banner.jpg

156 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

58 ms

banner2.png

banner2.png

246 ms

banner1.png

banner1.png

154 ms

slide4.jpeg

slide4.jpeg

94 ms

contener-bg.png

contener-bg.png

93 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

103 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

13 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

14 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

15 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

13 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

13 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

96 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

105 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

collect

collect

47 ms

Accessibility Review

classiconlinetest.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

classiconlinetest.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

classiconlinetest.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classiconlinetest.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Classiconlinetest.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

classiconlinetest.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Classiconlinetest. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: