Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

codefig.com

codefig

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

518 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

66 ms

codefig.com screenshot

About Website

Visit codefig.com now to see the best up-to-date Codefig content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about codefig.com

Visit codefig.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Codefig.com page load time and found that the first response time was 518 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

codefig.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.05

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.3 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

codefig.com

518 ms

style.css

92 ms

animate.min.css

184 ms

all.min.css

25 ms

css

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Codefig.com, 25% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (703 ms) belongs to the original domain Codefig.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 97.5 kB (48%)

Content Size

204.8 kB

After Optimization

107.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Codefig.com main page is 204.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 196.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 6.2 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 93.0 kB

  • Original 196.9 kB
  • After minification 103.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Codefig needs image optimization as it can save up to 93.0 kB or 47% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 325 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.7 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codefig.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 325 B or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (60%)

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codefig. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

codefig.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

codefig.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

codefig.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codefig.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Codefig.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Codefig. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: