Tools & Wizards About Us
constructionjournal.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

constructionjournal.net

CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL - Commercial Construction Leads and Project Information

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

538 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

127 ms

constructionjournal.net screenshot

About Website

Visit constructionjournal.net now to see the best up-to-date CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about constructionjournal.net

Win more business with commercial construction leads. Powerful data, tools and analytics to help you stay ahead of your competitors.

Visit constructionjournal.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Constructionjournal.net page load time and found that the first response time was 538 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

constructionjournal.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

constructionjournal.net

538 ms

Site.css

290 ms

home_top.js

150 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

756 ms

galleria-1.2.8.min.js

347 ms

Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Constructionjournal.net, 8% (8 requests) were made to Ecn.dev.virtualearth.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Constructionjournal.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 813.4 kB (34%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Constructionjournal.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 61.2 kB

  • Original 78.3 kB
  • After minification 66.1 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 41.2 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 619.7 kB

  • Original 753.4 kB
  • After minification 460.3 kB
  • After compression 133.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 619.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 91.2 kB

  • Original 107.8 kB
  • After minification 90.5 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Constructionjournal.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (29%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

72

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

constructionjournal.net

constructionjournal.net

538 ms

Site.css

Site.css

290 ms

home_top.js

home_top.js

150 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

756 ms

galleria-1.2.8.min.js

galleria-1.2.8.min.js

347 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

179 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

82 ms

helper.css

helper.css

115 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

242 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

678 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

192 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

231 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

245 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

265 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

275 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

286 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

290 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

298 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

366 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

320 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

322 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

307 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

329 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

362 ms

iMAWebCookie.js

iMAWebCookie.js

22 ms

construction_journal_logo.gif

construction_journal_logo.gif

42 ms

a.gif

a.gif

34 ms

nav1_dormant.gif

nav1_dormant.gif

38 ms

nav2_dormant.gif

nav2_dormant.gif

39 ms

nav3_dormant.gif

nav3_dormant.gif

44 ms

nav4_dormant.gif

nav4_dormant.gif

89 ms

header_twitter_icon.gif

header_twitter_icon.gif

89 ms

header_linkedin_icon.gif

header_linkedin_icon.gif

89 ms

red_login_button.gif

red_login_button.gif

89 ms

browse_construction_leads.gif

browse_construction_leads.gif

157 ms

go_button.gif

go_button.gif

90 ms

marquis_2.png

marquis_2.png

871 ms

marquis_3.png

marquis_3.png

533 ms

marquis_4.png

marquis_4.png

681 ms

marquis_5.png

marquis_5.png

1070 ms

marquis_6.png

marquis_6.png

779 ms

marquis_7.png

marquis_7.png

1139 ms

coverage_areas.gif

coverage_areas.gif

574 ms

pan_expand.gif

pan_expand.gif

612 ms

actionable_opportunities.gif

actionable_opportunities.gif

652 ms

latest_construction_leads.gif

latest_construction_leads.gif

688 ms

refresh_latest_projects.gif

refresh_latest_projects.gif

720 ms

close_box.gif

close_box.gif

724 ms

construction_journal_footer_logo.gif

construction_journal_footer_logo.gif

758 ms

project_information_intelligence_footer.gif

project_information_intelligence_footer.gif

765 ms

footer_free_access_pass.gif

footer_free_access_pass.gif

794 ms

footer_social_icon_facebook.gif

footer_social_icon_facebook.gif

803 ms

footer_social_icon_twitter.gif

footer_social_icon_twitter.gif

814 ms

footer_social_icon_linkedin.gif

footer_social_icon_linkedin.gif

833 ms

flag_usa_nav.jpg

flag_usa_nav.jpg

844 ms

top_blend.gif

top_blend.gif

790 ms

header_bar_background.gif

header_bar_background.gif

797 ms

galleria.classic.min.js

galleria.classic.min.js

792 ms

coverage_map_mini.aspx

coverage_map_mini.aspx

815 ms

feedback.aspx

feedback.aspx

824 ms

container_left.gif

container_left.gif

828 ms

center_metrics_container.gif

center_metrics_container.gif

869 ms

container_right.gif

container_right.gif

860 ms

footer_blend.gif

footer_blend.gif

859 ms

footer_rule.gif

footer_rule.gif

860 ms

ga.js

ga.js

19 ms

like.php

like.php

93 ms

helper.gif

helper.gif

895 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

23 ms

qeKvIRsJabD.js

qeKvIRsJabD.js

509 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

576 ms

galleria.classic.css

galleria.classic.css

144 ms

mapcontrol.ashx

mapcontrol.ashx

26 ms

feedback_close_box.gif

feedback_close_box.gif

116 ms

tell_us_what_you_think.gif

tell_us_what_you_think.gif

117 ms

cj_logo_feedback.gif

cj_logo_feedback.gif

126 ms

feedback_rules.png

feedback_rules.png

130 ms

feedback_left_top_container.gif

feedback_left_top_container.gif

134 ms

rate_your_experience.gif

rate_your_experience.gif

142 ms

feedback_left_bottom_container.gif

feedback_left_bottom_container.gif

145 ms

describe_yourself.gif

describe_yourself.gif

158 ms

feedback_right_container.gif

feedback_right_container.gif

164 ms

add_your_comments.gif

add_your_comments.gif

180 ms

captcha.aspx

captcha.aspx

179 ms

submit_feedback_button.gif

submit_feedback_button.gif

180 ms

atlascompat.js

atlascompat.js

10 ms

mapcontrol.css

mapcontrol.css

6 ms

r0213.png

r0213.png

40 ms

r0302.png

r0302.png

42 ms

r0231.png

r0231.png

41 ms

r0320.png

r0320.png

41 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

38 ms

Log

Log

37 ms

map_pin_cj.png

map_pin_cj.png

94 ms

r0321.png

r0321.png

15 ms

r0303.png

r0303.png

17 ms

vecss.png

vecss.png

16 ms

nav_select.gif

nav_select.gif

15 ms

vecss.gif

vecss.gif

16 ms

nav_select_gray.gif

nav_select_gray.gif

17 ms

classic-loader.gif

classic-loader.gif

89 ms

classic-map.png

classic-map.png

92 ms

SEO Factors

constructionjournal.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Constructionjournal.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Constructionjournal.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

constructionjournal.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: