Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

curecomp.com

Die clevere eProcurement- und SRM-Lösung | curecomp

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

671 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

365 ms

curecomp.com screenshot

About Website

Visit curecomp.com now to see the best up-to-date Curecomp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about curecomp.com

Die eProcurement- und SRM-Lösungen von curecomp entlasten den Einkauf. Agieren Sie dynamischer und steigern Sie Ihren Beitrag zum Erfolg des Unternehmens.

Visit curecomp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Curecomp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 671 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

curecomp.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value31.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value44.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.curecomp.com

671 ms

merged-bcc2bcbe138dfa5abed3c20452bd5b36-5a383697d9f0978701456c7b400b3e9e.css.gzip

468 ms

js

48 ms

merged-b569a0173e32f8ef532d1d7100a8a215-e7c0083f5317017d4cbc46609eed6d1c.js.gzip

431 ms

merged-7311554b19051b7a2b1596f26ab961c8-e4a8c9fbfc8c41c52d1144ae2e7ba808.js.gzip

228 ms

Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Curecomp.com, 22% (24 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 11% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Curecomp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (35%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Curecomp.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 80.7 kB

  • Original 95.0 kB
  • After minification 94.5 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Curecomp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 925.1 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 396.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 925.1 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 495.8 kB

  • Original 586.5 kB
  • After minification 575.1 kB
  • After compression 90.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Curecomp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 495.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (26%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

70

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Curecomp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

curecomp.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

curecomp.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

curecomp.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Curecomp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Curecomp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Curecomp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: