4.9 sec in total
1.7 sec
3 sec
226 ms
Click here to check amazing Dink content for South Africa. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dink.co.uk
Dink
Visit dink.co.ukWe analyzed Dink.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
dink.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.9 s
22/100
10%
Value1,150 ms
22/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
1679 ms
328 ms
174 ms
23 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Dink.co.uk, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Dink.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 442.5 kB (41%)
1.1 MB
624.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Dink.co.uk main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 492.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.6 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dink images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 313.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 313.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 102.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dink.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 102.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (48%)
50
26
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dink.co.uk
1679 ms
stylesheet.css
328 ms
tm_flexslider.css
174 ms
css
23 ms
css
33 ms
custom.css
167 ms
carousel.css
175 ms
responsive.css
175 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
433 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.min.js
648 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css
384 ms
common.js
270 ms
carousel.min.js
349 ms
megnor.min.js
362 ms
custom.js
405 ms
jquery.custom.min.js
446 ms
scrolltop.min.js
446 ms
jquery.formalize.min.js
470 ms
jstree.min.js
486 ms
cloudzoom.js
515 ms
fancybox.js
596 ms
tm_jquery.flexslider.min.js
613 ms
dink-logo.png
165 ms
sprite.png
99 ms
pipe.gif
90 ms
cart.png
83 ms
arrow-down.png
85 ms
spacer.gif
92 ms
cat_arrow.png
167 ms
dink1-150x150.jpg
185 ms
dink5-150x150.jpg
196 ms
stars-5.png
176 ms
email.png
180 ms
fb.png
249 ms
google.png
248 ms
in.png
267 ms
tw.png
266 ms
v.png
266 ms
youtube.png
277 ms
logos.jpg
334 ms
slide1-760x395.jpg
612 ms
slide2-760x395.jpg
625 ms
slide3-760x395.jpg
505 ms
slide4-760x395.jpg
525 ms
slide5-760x395.jpg
596 ms
dink10-150x150.jpg
414 ms
dink20-150x150.jpg
497 ms
procydin-150x150.jpg
590 ms
promato-150x150.jpg
588 ms
payment-icons.png
608 ms
up.png
670 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
6 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
9 ms
PKBzyL4HSyakLt5dMEVc8A.ttf
22 ms
dink.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
dink.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
dink.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dink.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dink.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dink.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: