5.4 sec in total
174 ms
4.5 sec
717 ms
Click here to check amazing Double Check Builders content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about doublecheckbuilders.com
Visit doublecheckbuilders.comWe analyzed Doublecheckbuilders.com page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
doublecheckbuilders.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value23.6 s
0/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value1,000 ms
27/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value22.5 s
1/100
10%
174 ms
1598 ms
246 ms
250 ms
185 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Doublecheckbuilders.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Longislandwebdesigner.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Doublecheckbuilders.com.
Page size can be reduced by 580.0 kB (11%)
5.2 MB
4.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Doublecheckbuilders.com main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 187.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 187.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 244.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Double Check Builders images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 76.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.8 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Doublecheckbuilders.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.6 kB or 34% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (55%)
58
26
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Double Check Builders. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
doublecheckbuilders.com
174 ms
doublecheckbuilders.com
1598 ms
aej21.css
246 ms
aej21.css
250 ms
aej21.css
185 ms
post-10.css
187 ms
aej21.css
189 ms
post-107.css
241 ms
post-110.css
367 ms
post-312.css
369 ms
aej21.css
551 ms
css
33 ms
aej23.css
483 ms
css
46 ms
aej21.js
536 ms
aej21.js
494 ms
aej23.js
615 ms
aej21.css
497 ms
seamless.js
47 ms
aej23.css
839 ms
general.min.js
859 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
860 ms
frontend-script.js
961 ms
widget-scripts.js
1017 ms
frontend.js
990 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1036 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1086 ms
waypoints.min.js
1036 ms
core.min.js
1107 ms
frontend.min.js
1234 ms
animate-circle.js
1194 ms
elementor.js
1212 ms
swiper.min.js
1334 ms
70475374-1.png
507 ms
cr_logo-1.jpg
529 ms
whitebg.png
698 ms
banner-1.jpg
1067 ms
home-improvement-long-island.jpg
1071 ms
long-island-home-improvement.jpg
955 ms
Untitled-1-300x300.jpg
904 ms
Untitled-2.jpg
971 ms
Untitled-3-300x300.jpg
967 ms
Untitled-4-300x300.jpg
1084 ms
kitchen-remodeling-long-island.jpg
1261 ms
home-improvement-long-island1.jpg
1207 ms
Decks-Long-Island.jpg
1282 ms
IMAG0474.jpg
1422 ms
IMAG0215.jpg
1363 ms
IMAG0156.jpg
1378 ms
builderon-img15-1.png
1389 ms
builderon-img14-1.png
1443 ms
builderon-img12-1.png
1463 ms
builderon-img13-1.png
1545 ms
builderon-img11-1.png
1565 ms
pro-badge-white-bg-gold.png
1567 ms
home-3.png
565 ms
builderon-img31.png
491 ms
font
135 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1677 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1563 ms
font
165 ms
font
166 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1532 ms
eicons.woff
1669 ms
aej21.css
71 ms
30.6b8377c2dd67a7f02809.js
32 ms
198.26a85f89be183e88c565.js
40 ms
doublecheckbuilders.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
doublecheckbuilders.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
doublecheckbuilders.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Doublecheckbuilders.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Doublecheckbuilders.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
doublecheckbuilders.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Double Check Builders. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: