6.3 sec in total
337 ms
5.7 sec
319 ms
Click here to check amazing Eblock content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eblock.net
Mit Gehaltsextras von Edenred ✓ Mitarbeiter binden ✓ Marke stärken ✓ Lohnnebenkosten sparen. Jetzt große Auswahl entdecken!
Visit eblock.netWe analyzed Eblock.net page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
eblock.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value8,780 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.141
78/100
15%
Value15.2 s
7/100
10%
337 ms
1292 ms
320 ms
328 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eblock.net, 82% (42 requests) were made to Eblock.edenred.de and 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Eblock.edenred.de.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (52%)
2.0 MB
935.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Eblock.net main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 829.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 149.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eblock needs image optimization as it can save up to 149.6 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 588.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 588.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 241.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eblock.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 241.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (33%)
43
29
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eblock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eblock.net
337 ms
eblock.edenred.de
1292 ms
stylesheet_6ee03be3fe.css
320 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
328 ms
css
51 ms
font-awesome.min.css
438 ms
bootstrap.min.css
762 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
445 ms
main.css
555 ms
responsive.css
650 ms
blog_KeQuestionnaire.css
756 ms
blog_main.css
885 ms
blog_main_responsive.css
778 ms
merged-1da5c601c6b2d69f89c647851fc16a2e.js
1880 ms
merged-17dc8dae0f098fa1e7dd5dad8efd5904.js
1989 ms
merged-174d963840aea23c838ce77891f58bd7.js
1402 ms
0b0aab3b51_keqjs.js
1090 ms
analytics.js
72 ms
edenred-logo.png
223 ms
csm_Edenred-Eblock-Banner_74fc5eb83d.jpg
332 ms
xing_blue.png
439 ms
linkedin_blue.png
450 ms
googleplus_blue.png
452 ms
twitter_blue.png
463 ms
youtube_blue.png
652 ms
csm_Fisch_a_Eblock_fe68808fcd.jpg
663 ms
csm_Vorlage-Autorenbilder_E-Block-Team_Versuch1_183d386f79.png
771 ms
DenkervonRodin.png
1221 ms
Calculator_Stift_Muenzen_Klein.jpg
1002 ms
csm_Autorenbilder_C.Elter_neu_67abca6fd2.png
798 ms
KantineA_E-Block.jpg
1203 ms
lupe_icon.png
1109 ms
s-radio.png
1365 ms
Vorlage-Autorenbilder_E-Block-Team_Versuch1.png
1203 ms
Autorenbilder_C.Elter_neu.png
1503 ms
Autorenfoto-Guenter-Wolf.png
1514 ms
Autorenbild_A.Sievers_Neu.png
1598 ms
Autorenfoto-MarkusSchuetz.png
1622 ms
Autorenfoto-Martin-Juenger.png
1624 ms
Autorenfoto-KathrinHausleiter.png
1757 ms
csm_Beitrag_steuerfreie-arbeitgeberleistungen_fde48256c0.png
2050 ms
Lunch_UEbersicht.jpg
1944 ms
guC5lwT5Dw7anV_xfpCGqw.ttf
127 ms
obisuY-MenYRAFwd-r2NhfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
129 ms
0b3R8ORT0i9mlMGM3BxXF_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
150 ms
Luunk03-uSz9LnB7oNEUuvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
156 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
2023 ms
collect
33 ms
collect
74 ms
bx_loader.gif
1819 ms
controls.png
1819 ms
eblock.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eblock.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
eblock.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eblock.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eblock.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eblock.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eblock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: