7.4 sec in total
1.6 sec
5.5 sec
259 ms
Welcome to embassat.com homepage info - get ready to check Embassa T best content for Spain right away, or after learning these important things about embassat.com
Visit embassat.comWe analyzed Embassat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
embassat.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value5.0 s
26/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value1,480 ms
14/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
1630 ms
118 ms
325 ms
217 ms
216 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Embassat.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Embassat.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (79%)
2.8 MB
591.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Embassat.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 227.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Embassa T needs image optimization as it can save up to 227.5 kB or 68% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 715.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 715.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Embassat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (79%)
58
12
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Embassa T. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.embassat.com
1630 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
118 ms
dashicons.min.css
325 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
217 ms
styles.css
216 ms
settings.css
224 ms
style.css
226 ms
plugins.min.css
275 ms
modules.min.css
548 ms
font-awesome.min.css
329 ms
style.min.css
335 ms
ionicons.min.css
339 ms
style.css
387 ms
simple-line-icons.css
427 ms
dripicons.css
435 ms
style_dynamic.css
444 ms
modules-responsive.min.css
448 ms
blog-responsive.min.css
495 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
533 ms
js_composer.min.css
789 ms
css
65 ms
jquery.js
780 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
557 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
760 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
640 ms
core.min.js
642 ms
widget.min.js
664 ms
mouse.min.js
747 ms
resizable.min.js
747 ms
draggable.min.js
776 ms
button.min.js
965 ms
position.min.js
965 ms
dialog.min.js
965 ms
wpdialog.min.js
966 ms
jquery.form.min.js
973 ms
scripts.js
971 ms
tabs.min.js
973 ms
js
38 ms
accordion.min.js
971 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
900 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
803 ms
third-party.min.js
1149 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
833 ms
smoothPageScroll.js
946 ms
modules.min.js
896 ms
comment-reply.min.js
848 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
840 ms
like.min.js
831 ms
wp-embed.min.js
921 ms
logo-footer-2.png
297 ms
logo-sticky-5.png
752 ms
logo_b.png
295 ms
b-1.jpg
753 ms
red-1.jpg
745 ms
groc.jpg
1546 ms
blau-1.jpg
743 ms
b.jpg
1345 ms
pFZGRS3ywNfpSqkEIed1Ww.ttf
158 ms
gMhvhm-nVj1086DvGgmzB6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
156 ms
WtcvfJHWXKxx4x0kuS1koaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
158 ms
nsLtvfQoT-rVwGTHHnkeJqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
155 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
156 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
155 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
703 ms
noedisplaybold-webfont.ttf
798 ms
ajax-loader.gif
116 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
212 ms
embassat.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
embassat.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
embassat.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Embassat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Embassat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
embassat.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Embassa T. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: