1.2 sec in total
84 ms
829 ms
296 ms
Click here to check amazing EMedicinal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about emedicinal.com
The Internet's Resource on Medicinal Herbs
Visit emedicinal.comWe analyzed Emedicinal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
emedicinal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.1 s
99/100
10%
Value2.3 s
93/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value1,250 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
84 ms
28 ms
30 ms
6 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Emedicinal.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (240 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 49.8 kB (41%)
120.4 kB
70.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Emedicinal.com main page is 120.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 43.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.1 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 447 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EMedicinal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 39% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emedicinal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (71%)
48
14
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EMedicinal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
emedicinal.com
84 ms
date.js
28 ms
styles.css
30 ms
show_ads.js
6 ms
counter.js
15 ms
ca-pub-6277653137551218.js
156 ms
zrt_lookup.html
56 ms
show_ads_impl.js
57 ms
t.php
166 ms
pagebg.gif
116 ms
topcornerbarleft.gif
115 ms
topbar.gif
121 ms
topcornerbar.gif
118 ms
sidebarleft.gif
118 ms
spacer.gif
116 ms
logo.gif
119 ms
navcorn.gif
117 ms
navback.gif
118 ms
homepage.jpg
127 ms
li.gif
120 ms
butback.gif
118 ms
buttons.gif
120 ms
arrow.gif
121 ms
horzdotline.gif
122 ms
dotline.gif
121 ms
cautionhome.jpg
122 ms
adbg.gif
126 ms
ladynewsletter.gif
124 ms
adbot.gif
122 ms
subscribelong.gif
123 ms
forum.gif
124 ms
clickhereforum.gif
126 ms
botback.gif
126 ms
lightblue.gif
126 ms
sidebar.gif
126 ms
cornerbarleft.gif
127 ms
botbar.gif
128 ms
cornerbar.gif
128 ms
ads
240 ms
osd.js
22 ms
ads
207 ms
css
55 ms
m_js_controller.js
25 ms
abg.js
26 ms
favicon
79 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
64 ms
s
43 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
71 ms
favicon
113 ms
x_button_blue2.png
14 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
3 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
110 ms
ui
65 ms
emedicinal.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
emedicinal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
emedicinal.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emedicinal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Emedicinal.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
emedicinal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EMedicinal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: