Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

finger-protection.co.uk

Finger Guards for Doors | Anti-finger trapping devices | Quick and Secure Online Sales - finger-protection.co.uk

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

583 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

434 ms

finger-protection.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit finger-protection.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Finger Protection content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about finger-protection.co.uk

The biggest range of door finger guards in the UK | Anti-finger trapping devices | Finger Guards for Doors from £9.49 (front) & £4.95 (rear) ex vat | Buy online.

Visit finger-protection.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Finger-protection.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 583 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

finger-protection.co.uk performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,930 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.208

60/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.finger-protection.co.uk

583 ms

bf41897b71522d53417bf258d835144e.gelato.css.php

96 ms

dae9357400e049f839d1e3b20333f334.jquery.js.php

294 ms

b9486148fab0f4b573fdbb9a8e7de1b2.jqueryui.js.php

419 ms

890bb4d74c823f411a154d91e12e88dc.gelato.functions.js.php

347 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Finger-protection.co.uk, 8% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (708 ms) relates to the external source Eocampaign1.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.6 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Finger-protection.co.uk main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 954.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 23.8 kB

  • Original 31.2 kB
  • After minification 31.1 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 37.6 kB

  • Original 954.6 kB
  • After minification 917.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Finger Protection images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 152.2 kB
  • After minification 152.2 kB
  • After compression 141.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Finger-protection.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (19%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Finger Protection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

finger-protection.co.uk accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

finger-protection.co.uk best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

finger-protection.co.uk SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Finger-protection.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Finger-protection.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Finger Protection. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: