1.8 sec in total
217 ms
1.4 sec
160 ms
Welcome to gap.com homepage info - get ready to check Gap best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about gap.com
Shop casual women's, men's, maternity, kids' & baby clothes at Gap. Our style is clean and confident, comfortable and accessible, classic and modern. Find the perfect pair of jeans, t-s...
Visit gap.comWe analyzed Gap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 217 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
gap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value17.6 s
0/100
25%
Value14.5 s
1/100
10%
Value17,420 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.655
8/100
15%
Value42.4 s
0/100
10%
217 ms
73 ms
409 ms
125 ms
184 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Gap.com, 3% (1 request) were made to S.go-mpulse.net and 3% (1 request) were made to C.go-mpulse.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (409 ms) belongs to the original domain Gap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 461.3 kB (79%)
585.9 kB
124.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Gap.com main page is 585.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 424.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 351.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 351.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 108.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 108.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (85%)
34
5
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.gap.com
217 ms
www.gap.com
73 ms
www.gap.com
409 ms
react17.0.2.min.js
125 ms
c.mcslib.bad2e77e.js
184 ms
10362.28fb7e52.js
167 ms
85776.6b523387.js
139 ms
1297.5c7a162b.js
139 ms
14364.3c5bca76.js
156 ms
33950.c62b3fca.js
168 ms
33088.77c84996.js
158 ms
43093.a0641535.js
161 ms
55190.2d537869.js
183 ms
32277.049c2ffe.js
183 ms
78749.3f85b297.js
186 ms
19599.0ba365f1.js
186 ms
4737.39989470.js
187 ms
15746.ab26571e.js
201 ms
47987.d753b6a3.js
281 ms
92468.c4d885a4.js
202 ms
33156.db809663.js
201 ms
52389.e0cbb87d.js
233 ms
83073.ccc312e7.js
230 ms
1370.1508a8ea.js
233 ms
35807.f2cdbfe3.js
241 ms
33014.7506b9a0.js
239 ms
44580.39386049.js
231 ms
84543.93f98973.js
278 ms
18460.9ba9c21d.js
277 ms
40179.14936962.js
282 ms
8TH7R-A8HZ6-FFABL-LUVZF-RTH3D
189 ms
hKFgYbAMB
225 ms
sec-4-1.css
163 ms
sec-cpt-4-1.js
191 ms
logo_gap--light.svg
215 ms
logo_gap--dark.svg
341 ms
config.json
185 ms
undefined
370 ms
gap.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
gap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
gap.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gap.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: