3.2 sec in total
693 ms
2.3 sec
219 ms
Welcome to ghg.com homepage info - get ready to check Ghg best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ghg.com
Clockwise time and attendance software is designed to help both big and small customers manage employee time and more. No setup cost, No training fees,.
Visit ghg.comWe analyzed Ghg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 693 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
ghg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value250 ms
85/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.7 s
45/100
10%
693 ms
67 ms
142 ms
132 ms
135 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Ghg.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (735 ms) belongs to the original domain Ghg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 443.2 kB (18%)
2.5 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Ghg.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 158.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ghg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 185.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 185.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ghg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (68%)
34
11
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ghg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ghg.com
693 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
67 ms
styles.css
142 ms
font-awesome.min.css
132 ms
wplcstyle.css
135 ms
style.css
137 ms
genericons.css
194 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.js
230 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
197 ms
wplc_u.js
201 ms
jquery-cookie.js
201 ms
spacious-custom.js
201 ms
mlab_popup.css
287 ms
core.min.js
289 ms
widget.min.js
293 ms
mouse.min.js
294 ms
draggable.min.js
292 ms
jquery.form.min.js
313 ms
scripts.js
326 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
324 ms
spacious-slider-setting.js
332 ms
navigation.js
333 ms
wp-embed.min.js
334 ms
mlab_popup.js
358 ms
analytics.js
46 ms
clockwise_dark.png
251 ms
vision.png
568 ms
handshake.png
735 ms
jigsaw.png
595 ms
vacation.png
717 ms
building_blocks.png
520 ms
close_pop.png
333 ms
clockwise_dark-300x64.png
397 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
35 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
192 ms
ga-audiences
43 ms
ghg.com accessibility score
ghg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ghg.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ghg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ghg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ghg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ghg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: