Tools & Wizards About Us
gilapsurgery.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

gilapsurgery.com

Dr. Manoj Choudhury | Best Laparoscopic Surgeon Guwahati | Robotic Surgery in Assam

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

gilapsurgery.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gilapsurgery.com homepage info - get ready to check Gilap Surgery best content right away, or after learning these important things about gilapsurgery.com

Discover Guwahati top Laparoscopic Surgeon specializing in Gallbladder, Hernia, Fistula, Piles, and Hepatobiliary procedures. Trust our expertise for your surgical needs.

Visit gilapsurgery.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gilapsurgery.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gilapsurgery.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value830 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.687

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.gilapsurgery.com

1059 ms

frontend.css

183 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

178 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

180 ms

frontend.min.css

184 ms

Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Gilapsurgery.com, 10% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Gilapsurgery.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (21%)

Content Size

10.5 MB

After Optimization

8.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gilapsurgery.com main page is 10.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 233.3 kB

  • Original 256.7 kB
  • After minification 244.4 kB
  • After compression 23.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 233.3 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 1.8 MB

  • Original 9.7 MB
  • After minification 7.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gilap Surgery needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 94.6 kB

  • Original 341.3 kB
  • After minification 341.3 kB
  • After compression 246.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 94.6 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 65.2 kB

  • Original 202.3 kB
  • After minification 202.1 kB
  • After compression 137.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gilapsurgery.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.2 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (66%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gilap Surgery. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 40 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.gilapsurgery.com

www.gilapsurgery.com

1059 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

183 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

178 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

180 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

184 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

180 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

239 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

240 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

240 ms

global.css

global.css

243 ms

fadeInUp.min.css

fadeInUp.min.css

244 ms

widget-slides.min.css

widget-slides.min.css

301 ms

widget-spacer.min.css

widget-spacer.min.css

300 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

300 ms

widget-divider.min.css

widget-divider.min.css

303 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

305 ms

widget-counter.min.css

widget-counter.min.css

361 ms

widget-carousel.min.css

widget-carousel.min.css

362 ms

e-animation-shrink.min.css

e-animation-shrink.min.css

361 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

363 ms

e-animation-pulse.min.css

e-animation-pulse.min.css

366 ms

zoomIn.min.css

zoomIn.min.css

378 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

423 ms

zoomInLeft.min.css

zoomInLeft.min.css

422 ms

zoomInRight.min.css

zoomInRight.min.css

421 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

431 ms

post-9.css

post-9.css

428 ms

post-70.css

post-70.css

438 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

483 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

483 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

543 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

608 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

492 ms

css

css

33 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

500 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

547 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

547 ms

js

js

62 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

455 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

387 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

289 ms

apple-webkit.min.css

apple-webkit.min.css

288 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

289 ms

widget-google_maps.min.css

widget-google_maps.min.css

344 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

404 ms

jquery-numerator.min.js

jquery-numerator.min.js

403 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

404 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

435 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

436 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

436 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

438 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

439 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

437 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

474 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

433 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

433 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

459 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

442 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

457 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

488 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

443 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

450 ms

LOGO2.png

LOGO2.png

336 ms

BANNER-1-scaled.jpg

BANNER-1-scaled.jpg

450 ms

banner-2-1-scaled.jpg

banner-2-1-scaled.jpg

451 ms

Anorectal-diseases-scaled.jpg

Anorectal-diseases-scaled.jpg

426 ms

hernia-surgery-2-scaled.jpg

hernia-surgery-2-scaled.jpg

376 ms

Solid-Organ-Surgery-1-scaled.jpg

Solid-Organ-Surgery-1-scaled.jpg

500 ms

dr.details-scaled.jpg

dr.details-scaled.jpg

511 ms

ABOUT-US-2.jpg

ABOUT-US-2.jpg

553 ms

External-and-internal-view-of-our-original-single-incision-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy.png

External-and-internal-view-of-our-original-single-incision-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy.png

489 ms

MenoufiaMedJ_2014_27_2_469_141729_f8.png

MenoufiaMedJ_2014_27_2_469_141729_f8.png

512 ms

2-Figure1-1.png

2-Figure1-1.png

568 ms

image-9.png

image-9.png

550 ms

CBD-pic1-e1700459170557.png

CBD-pic1-e1700459170557.png

561 ms

hernia-ventral.png

hernia-ventral.png

577 ms

gs13_fig1_laparoscopic-inguinal-hernia-repair-tep-a00299.png

gs13_fig1_laparoscopic-inguinal-hernia-repair-tep-a00299.png

689 ms

what-is-gynecologic-laparoscopy.png

what-is-gynecologic-laparoscopy.png

669 ms

crohns-disease.png

crohns-disease.png

614 ms

4.png

4.png

561 ms

body-with-stomach-tumor.png

body-with-stomach-tumor.png

569 ms

diverse-team-professional-surgeon_116317-3736.png

diverse-team-professional-surgeon_116317-3736.png

647 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

45 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

53 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

72 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQXKMny.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQXKMny.woff

81 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

83 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

82 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

588 ms

JTUSjIg69CK48gW7PXoo9WlhzSTh89Y.woff

JTUSjIg69CK48gW7PXoo9WlhzSTh89Y.woff

81 ms

Yq6W-LyURyLy-aKKHztwu8ZZvRIkSQ.woff

Yq6W-LyURyLy-aKKHztwu8ZZvRIkSQ.woff

138 ms

Yq6V-LyURyLy-aKCpB5jluRSlw.woff

Yq6V-LyURyLy-aKCpB5jluRSlw.woff

126 ms

6qLFKZkOuhnuqlJAUZsqKyMlFVnRaxM.woff

6qLFKZkOuhnuqlJAUZsqKyMlFVnRaxM.woff

103 ms

6qLAKZkOuhnuqlJAWSAPOA4HHnM.woff

6qLAKZkOuhnuqlJAWSAPOA4HHnM.woff

154 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

596 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

615 ms

gradient-technology-futuristic-background_52683-75946.jpg

gradient-technology-futuristic-background_52683-75946.jpg

636 ms

EJdCqwH2i8Z9zsAS7MoW-1024x708.png

EJdCqwH2i8Z9zsAS7MoW-1024x708.png

645 ms

Human-Xtensions-HandX-2.jpg

Human-Xtensions-HandX-2.jpg

650 ms

embed

embed

507 ms

Human-Xtensions-HandX-1.jpg

Human-Xtensions-HandX-1.jpg

623 ms

doctor.png

doctor.png

625 ms

LOGO2-1-1024x278.png

LOGO2-1-1024x278.png

626 ms

facebook-1.png

facebook-1.png

659 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

647 ms

youtube_logo-e1726649981468.png

youtube_logo-e1726649981468.png

648 ms

js

js

37 ms

search.js

search.js

3 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

6 ms

main.js

main.js

10 ms

Accessibility Review

gilapsurgery.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gilapsurgery.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gilapsurgery.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gilapsurgery.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gilapsurgery.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gilapsurgery.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gilap Surgery. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: