Tools & Wizards About Us
glassjarphotography.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 46

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

glassjarphotography.com

Vintage Wedding Photography - Glass Jar Photography - Unique Wedding Photographers

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

144 ms

Resources Loaded

896 ms

Page Rendered

94 ms

glassjarphotography.com screenshot

About Website

Visit glassjarphotography.com now to see the best up-to-date Glass Jar Photography content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about glassjarphotography.com

Vintage wedding photography, Destination wedding photography, modern wedding photography, fine art wedding photography. Unique Wedding Photographers

Visit glassjarphotography.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glassjarphotography.com page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 990 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glassjarphotography.com performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

91/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.066

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index2.php

144 ms

jquery.jscrollpane.css

115 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

154 ms

jquery.effects.core.js

136 ms

rotate.js

137 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Glassjarphotography.com, 13% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (300 ms) belongs to the original domain Glassjarphotography.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 325.3 kB (64%)

Content Size

504.8 kB

After Optimization

179.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glassjarphotography.com main page is 504.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 349.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 295.1 kB

  • Original 349.1 kB
  • After minification 316.4 kB
  • After compression 54.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 295.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 21.6 kB
  • After minification 12.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Glass Jar Photography needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 41% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 21.1 kB

  • Original 133.5 kB
  • After minification 133.5 kB
  • After compression 112.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 217 B

  • Original 613 B
  • After minification 613 B
  • After compression 396 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glassjarphotography.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 217 B or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (61%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glass Jar Photography. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

index2.php

index2.php

144 ms

jquery.jscrollpane.css

jquery.jscrollpane.css

115 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

154 ms

jquery.effects.core.js

jquery.effects.core.js

136 ms

rotate.js

rotate.js

137 ms

flexcroll.js

flexcroll.js

144 ms

jquery.address-1.4.js

jquery.address-1.4.js

134 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

185 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

190 ms

jquery.form.js

jquery.form.js

192 ms

bridge.js

bridge.js

197 ms

excanvas.js

excanvas.js

200 ms

spinners.js

spinners.js

207 ms

jquery.jscrollpane.js

jquery.jscrollpane.js

225 ms

soundmanager2-jsmin.js

soundmanager2-jsmin.js

249 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

245 ms

icon-twitter-3.png

icon-twitter-3.png

249 ms

icon-facebook-3.png

icon-facebook-3.png

252 ms

icon-facebook-like-1.png

icon-facebook-like-1.png

268 ms

icon-pinterest-1.png

icon-pinterest-1.png

275 ms

favorites.png

favorites.png

300 ms

shared.js

shared.js

109 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

116 ms

GillSans.ttf

GillSans.ttf

172 ms

ga.js

ga.js

126 ms

new-logo.png

new-logo.png

59 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

15 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

46 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

47 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

45 ms

Accessibility Review

glassjarphotography.com accessibility score

46

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

glassjarphotography.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

glassjarphotography.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glassjarphotography.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Glassjarphotography.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glassjarphotography.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glass Jar Photography. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: