5 sec in total
273 ms
4.6 sec
198 ms
Visit gleamgroup.com now to see the best up-to-date Gleamgroup content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gleamgroup.com
Friendly and reliable Window Cleaner covering Upminster, Hornchurch, Colchester & Clacton in Essex. We also clean Conservatories, Fascias and soffits & more
Visit gleamgroup.comWe analyzed Gleamgroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
gleamgroup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value15.1 s
1/100
10%
Value1,830 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
273 ms
737 ms
407 ms
330 ms
60 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Gleamgroup.com, 24% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (737 ms) belongs to the original domain Gleamgroup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (69%)
2.4 MB
745.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Gleamgroup.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 758.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 758.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gleamgroup images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 919.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 919.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 125 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gleamgroup.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (36%)
14
9
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gleamgroup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
gleamgroup.com
273 ms
www.gleamgroup.com
737 ms
autoptimize_ff23d61de9b9a9eab315bd82e5d989cd.css
407 ms
jquery.js
330 ms
js
60 ms
autoptimize_12064e2f9820dcb7e215b284cd63b31f.js
317 ms
webfont.js
106 ms
logo.png
102 ms
logo-mobile.png
102 ms
dummy.png
101 ms
reach-wash-window-cleaning.jpg
296 ms
js
228 ms
analytics.js
219 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3ig.ttf
219 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTQ3ig.ttf
287 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3ig.ttf
286 ms
icomoon.woff
211 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
265 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
346 ms
css
120 ms
collect
53 ms
logo-lg.png
83 ms
XRXK3I6Li01BKofIMPyPbj8d7IEAGXNirXAHjabf.ttf
8 ms
XRXK3I6Li01BKofIMPyPbj8d7IEAGXNiSncHjabf.ttf
8 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3iazbXWjQeQ.woff
27 ms
gleamgroup.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
gleamgroup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
gleamgroup.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gleamgroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gleamgroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gleamgroup.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gleamgroup. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: