Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

greenwayshipping.no

Greenway Shipping: Greenway Shipping

Page Load Speed

9.2 sec in total

First Response

2.9 sec

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

422 ms

greenwayshipping.no screenshot

About Website

Visit greenwayshipping.no now to see the best up-to-date Greenway Shipping content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about greenwayshipping.no

Visit greenwayshipping.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Greenwayshipping.no page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

greenwayshipping.no performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

greenwayshipping.no

2868 ms

style.css

148 ms

showcase.css

389 ms

jquery.js

538 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

389 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Greenwayshipping.no, 5% (2 requests) were made to Platform.linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Greenwayshipping.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 12.0 kB (63%)

Content Size

19.0 kB

After Optimization

7.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Greenwayshipping.no main page is 19.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 18.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 18.8 kB
  • After minification 18.2 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 27 B

  • Original 277 B
  • After minification 274 B
  • After compression 250 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (49%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Greenway Shipping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

greenwayshipping.no accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

greenwayshipping.no best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

greenwayshipping.no SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Greenwayshipping.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Greenwayshipping.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Greenway Shipping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: