Tools & Wizards About Us
gute-pflege.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

gute-pflege.de

Pflegedienst in Wermelskirchen - Pflegedienst Lutermann & Bister

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

361 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

300 ms

gute-pflege.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gute Pflege content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gute-pflege.de

Lutermann & Bister - Ihr Pflegedienst in Wermelskirchen - seit 1993 betreuen wir Patientinnen und Patienten in Wermelskirchen

Visit gute-pflege.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Gute-pflege.de page load time and found that the first response time was 361 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gute-pflege.de performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,380 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.5 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gute-pflege.de

361 ms

www.gute-pflege.de

827 ms

sdm_wp_styles.css

334 ms

style.min.css

445 ms

wpa.css

334 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Gute-pflege.de, 1% (1 request) were made to and 1% (1 request) were made to Test2.gute-pflege.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Gute-pflege.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 388.1 kB (57%)

Content Size

680.3 kB

After Optimization

292.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Gute-pflege.de main page is 680.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 474.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 376.8 kB

  • Original 474.8 kB
  • After minification 471.9 kB
  • After compression 98.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 376.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 11.3 kB

  • Original 205.5 kB
  • After minification 194.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gute Pflege images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (86%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gute Pflege. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 42 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gute-pflege.de

gute-pflege.de

361 ms

www.gute-pflege.de

www.gute-pflege.de

827 ms

sdm_wp_styles.css

sdm_wp_styles.css

334 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

445 ms

wpa.css

wpa.css

334 ms

swipebox.min.css

swipebox.min.css

332 ms

style.css

style.css

335 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

368 ms

hint.min.css

hint.min.css

441 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

446 ms

flexslider.min.css

flexslider.min.css

440 ms

nivo-slider.min.css

nivo-slider.min.css

447 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

477 ms

kwayy-lineicons.min.css

kwayy-lineicons.min.css

551 ms

kwayy-entypo.min.css

kwayy-entypo.min.css

555 ms

kwayy-typicons.min.css

kwayy-typicons.min.css

551 ms

kwayy-iconic.min.css

kwayy-iconic.min.css

552 ms

kwayy-mpictograms.min.css

kwayy-mpictograms.min.css

555 ms

kwayy-meteocons.min.css

kwayy-meteocons.min.css

585 ms

kwayy-mfglabs.min.css

kwayy-mfglabs.min.css

659 ms

kwayy-maki.min.css

kwayy-maki.min.css

660 ms

kwayy-zocial.min.css

kwayy-zocial.min.css

660 ms

kwayy-brandico.min.css

kwayy-brandico.min.css

659 ms

kwayy-elusive.min.css

kwayy-elusive.min.css

660 ms

kwayy-websymbols.min.css

kwayy-websymbols.min.css

694 ms

kwayy-twemojiawesome.min.css

kwayy-twemojiawesome.min.css

878 ms

kwayy-font-awesome.min.css

kwayy-font-awesome.min.css

771 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

768 ms

tm-social-icon.css

tm-social-icon.css

767 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

765 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

801 ms

bootstrap-adv.min.css

bootstrap-adv.min.css

988 ms

multi-columns-row.min.css

multi-columns-row.min.css

874 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

877 ms

js_composer_tta.min.css

js_composer_tta.min.css

879 ms

base-adv.min.css

base-adv.min.css

908 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

1208 ms

main-adv.min.css

main-adv.min.css

864 ms

dynamic-style-adv.min.css

dynamic-style-adv.min.css

673 ms

responsive-adv.min.css

responsive-adv.min.css

678 ms

redux-google-fonts-apicona.css

redux-google-fonts-apicona.css

699 ms

omgf-stylesheet-160.css

omgf-stylesheet-160.css

770 ms

omgf-stylesheet-76.css

omgf-stylesheet-76.css

749 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

677 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

705 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

773 ms

jquery.swipebox.min.js

jquery.swipebox.min.js

773 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

833 ms

infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js

infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js

806 ms

front.js

front.js

730 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

889 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

999 ms

sdm_wp_scripts.js

sdm_wp_scripts.js

774 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

775 ms

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

747 ms

wpa.js

wpa.js

706 ms

qppr_frontend_script.min.js

qppr_frontend_script.min.js

778 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

808 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

807 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

813 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

855 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

872 ms

functions_adv.min.js

functions_adv.min.js

872 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

867 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

868 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

857 ms

loader1.gif

loader1.gif

135 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

135 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

13 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

233 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

128 ms

logo-lfk-nrw.png

logo-lfk-nrw.png

673 ms

logo.png

logo.png

115 ms

Lutermann-Bister-2021-08-14.jpg

Lutermann-Bister-2021-08-14.jpg

223 ms

Wermelskirchen-Markt.jpg

Wermelskirchen-Markt.jpg

116 ms

lutermann-225x300.jpg

lutermann-225x300.jpg

113 ms

bister-225x300.jpg

bister-225x300.jpg

114 ms

Accessibility Review

gute-pflege.de accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gute-pflege.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gute-pflege.de SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gute-pflege.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gute-pflege.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gute-pflege.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gute Pflege. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: