5.5 sec in total
383 ms
3.6 sec
1.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Handsworthroadhogs content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about handsworthroadhogs.co.uk
Visit handsworthroadhogs.co.ukWe analyzed Handsworthroadhogs.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 383 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
handsworthroadhogs.co.uk performance score
383 ms
185 ms
670 ms
26 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Handsworthroadhogs.co.uk, 17% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Handsworthroadhogs.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 397.7 kB (46%)
873.3 kB
475.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Handsworthroadhogs.co.uk main page is 873.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 380.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.4 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Handsworthroadhogs images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 191.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 191.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 140.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Handsworthroadhogs.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 140.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (54%)
48
22
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Handsworthroadhogs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
handsworthroadhogs.co.uk
383 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
185 ms
style.min.css
670 ms
css
26 ms
css
44 ms
css
38 ms
css
41 ms
css
39 ms
css
38 ms
style.css
656 ms
editor-style.css
554 ms
style_base.css
555 ms
nivo-slider.css
564 ms
prettyPhoto.css
670 ms
font-awesome.css
762 ms
theme-responsive.css
665 ms
owl.carousel.css
672 ms
demo.css
755 ms
flexiselcss.css
770 ms
jquery.js
975 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
772 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
888 ms
custom.js
857 ms
owl.carousel.js
967 ms
jquery_mixitup.js
873 ms
jquery.flexisel.js
875 ms
wp-embed.min.js
957 ms
owa.tracker-combined-min.js
223 ms
piwik.js
344 ms
logodd-2.png
153 ms
mobile_nav_right.png
153 ms
loading.gif
151 ms
pagethumb1.jpg
150 ms
pagethumb2.jpg
273 ms
pagethumb3.jpg
275 ms
pagethumb4.jpg
275 ms
pagethumb5.jpg
274 ms
pagethumb6.jpg
276 ms
pagethumb7.jpg
315 ms
pagethumb8.jpg
320 ms
welcomebg.jpg
321 ms
welcome-img.jpg
324 ms
Trail-Running.jpg
456 ms
img_404.png
409 ms
footer-arrow.png
418 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
63 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
52 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
53 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
60 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-32meGCQYag.ttf
62 ms
ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-59U.ttf
65 ms
ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19K7CA.ttf
63 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-33mZGCQYag.ttf
63 ms
P5sMzZCDf9_T_20e.ttf
62 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
369 ms
log.php
273 ms
piwik.php
1114 ms
handsworthroadhogs.co.uk
157 ms
handsworthroadhogs.co.uk
160 ms
handsworthroadhogs.co.uk SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Handsworthroadhogs.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Handsworthroadhogs.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
handsworthroadhogs.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Handsworthroadhogs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: