Tools & Wizards About Us
hnitlk.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

hnitlk.com

شات حنيت , شات حنيت لك , شات حنيت لك للجوال , حنيت , حنيت لك , حنيت لك للجوال , شات حنيت الك , شات حنيت الك للجوال , شات حنيت , شات للجوال , شات ايفون...

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

25 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

73 ms

hnitlk.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hnitlk content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hnitlk.com

شات حنيت , شات حنيت لك , شات حنيت لك للجوال , حنيت , حنيت لك , حنيت لك للجوال , شات حنيت الك , شات حنيت الك للجوال , شات حنيت , شات للجوال , شات ايفون هوست للجوال -دردشة ايفون هوست للجوال - شات ايفون ...

Visit hnitlk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hnitlk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 25 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hnitlk.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value13,590 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.099

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value113.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hnitlk.com

25 ms

hnitlk.com

603 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

437 ms

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

428 ms

bootstrap.min.css

428 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Hnitlk.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Www11.0zz0.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Www7.0zz0.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Hnitlk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 127.8 kB (21%)

Content Size

617.9 kB

After Optimization

490.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Hnitlk.com main page is 617.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 474.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 125.7 kB

  • Original 143.5 kB
  • After minification 124.0 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.5 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 474.5 kB
  • After minification 472.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hnitlk images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (50%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hnitlk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hnitlk.com

hnitlk.com

25 ms

hnitlk.com

hnitlk.com

603 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

437 ms

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

428 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

428 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

454 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

453 ms

socket.io.2.0.3.js

socket.io.2.0.3.js

504 ms

style.css

style.css

867 ms

jquery.dataTables.min.css

jquery.dataTables.min.css

870 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

875 ms

client.min.js

client.min.js

864 ms

app.js

app.js

884 ms

jscolor.js

jscolor.js

925 ms

peer.js

peer.js

1296 ms

jquery.dataTables.min.js

jquery.dataTables.min.js

1304 ms

color.js

color.js

1194 ms

645259051.png

645259051.png

384 ms

744248951.png

744248951.png

381 ms

996030859.png

996030859.png

396 ms

bootbrb.gif

bootbrb.gif

426 ms

1714676927805.jpg

1714676927805.jpg

424 ms

emoii.gif

emoii.gif

101 ms

icon.gif

icon.gif

428 ms

pic.png

pic.png

415 ms

im1.png

im1.png

428 ms

s1.png

s1.png

540 ms

lock.png

lock.png

849 ms

1692661158507.jpg

1692661158507.jpg

845 ms

creft.js

creft.js

833 ms

fontawesome-webfont3295.woff

fontawesome-webfont3295.woff

505 ms

fontawesome-webfont3295.ttf

fontawesome-webfont3295.ttf

431 ms

fontawesome-webfont3295.svg

fontawesome-webfont3295.svg

425 ms

Accessibility Review

hnitlk.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

hnitlk.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

hnitlk.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    AR

  • Language Claimed

    AR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hnitlk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hnitlk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hnitlk.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hnitlk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: