Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

hometrack.net

Experience Unmatched Quality with Hometrack Real Estate Photography and Marketing Services!

Page Load Speed

8.7 sec in total

First Response

16 ms

Resources Loaded

7.8 sec

Page Rendered

839 ms

hometrack.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hometrack content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hometrack.net

Discover the Power of Hometrack Real Estate Photography: Elevate Your Listings with Stunning Visuals. Get Professional Quality and Sell Faster Today! Click here to see how we can help! Striving to pro...

Visit hometrack.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Hometrack.net page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hometrack.net performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,380 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.061

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hometrack.net

16 ms

www.hometrack.net

95 ms

script.js

149 ms

css2

77 ms

css2

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 316 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Hometrack.net, 84% (267 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com and 3% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 519.3 kB (41%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

747.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Hometrack.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 589.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 499.1 kB

  • Original 589.9 kB
  • After minification 576.6 kB
  • After compression 90.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 499.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 168.6 kB
  • After minification 151.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hometrack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 339.2 kB
  • After minification 339.2 kB
  • After compression 336.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 707 B

  • Original 169.1 kB
  • After minification 169.1 kB
  • After compression 168.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hometrack.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (8%)

Requests Now

306

After Optimization

283

The browser has sent 306 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hometrack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

hometrack.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

hometrack.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

hometrack.net SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hometrack.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hometrack.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hometrack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: