Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

icritical.com

Email Security, Email Archiving and Web Security - FuseMail

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

184 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

255 ms

icritical.com screenshot

About Website

Visit icritical.com now to see the best up-to-date Icritical content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about icritical.com

FuseMail provide email security and web filtering to SMEs across Ireland.

Visit icritical.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Icritical.com page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

icritical.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

icritical.com

184 ms

www.fusemail.com

469 ms

hY_hDoIwDIRfyNJg4qv4f4yCk23FHSTu7R2IEqOJ_-5rr81dzZ1qo_fzkS2wQRVcPJy4Nbg4qxEr19xLFDhQ0MZ5oSBxZkzZS9kNiZJm4wnetZJ4hW_9x4nBRbCdMWngBHqqchQydSbaXMKRGUe-3mZJuXrNimM0vZB3mNYeb9pip6VHu0v8lp_u5dGODw.css

221 ms

M9QvSUzKSS0oSi0u1k8G4pTUtMTSnBK93Mw8AA.css

229 ms

language-selector.css

228 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Icritical.com, 82% (56 requests) were made to Fusemail.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Corpstaging.fusemail.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 544.1 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

574.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Icritical.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 401.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 37.3 kB

  • Original 45.4 kB
  • After minification 41.3 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

  • Original 401.7 kB
  • After minification 382.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Icritical images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 201.5 kB

  • Original 309.3 kB
  • After minification 299.2 kB
  • After compression 107.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201.5 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 285.5 kB

  • Original 361.6 kB
  • After minification 287.4 kB
  • After compression 76.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Icritical.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 285.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (52%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Icritical. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

icritical.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Icritical.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Icritical.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Icritical. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: