13.2 sec in total
1.2 sec
11.3 sec
815 ms
Welcome to iglonline.net homepage info - get ready to check Iglonline best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about iglonline.net
Visit iglonline.netWe analyzed Iglonline.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 12.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
iglonline.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.2 s
1/100
10%
Value9.4 s
1/100
25%
Value15.1 s
1/100
10%
Value630 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.171
70/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
1164 ms
6329 ms
754 ms
765 ms
518 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Iglonline.net, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Iglonline.net.
Page size can be reduced by 706.5 kB (34%)
2.1 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Iglonline.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Iglonline images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 496.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 496.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Iglonline.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (37%)
51
32
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Iglonline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
iglonline.net
1164 ms
Default.aspx
6329 ms
bootstrap.css
754 ms
main.css
765 ms
flexnav-animate.css
518 ms
css
39 ms
flexslider.css
521 ms
font-awesome.min.css
796 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
730 ms
skitter.css
774 ms
jquery-3.2.1.min.js
1557 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
975 ms
jquery.skitter.js
1250 ms
jquery.flexnav.js
1014 ms
jquery.slider.js
1031 ms
scripts.js
1059 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1464 ms
logo.png
247 ms
img_smart-line2.png
501 ms
img_smart-line1.png
267 ms
IGL_EXTENDS_EMI_SCHEME-1.jpg
1293 ms
nav-bg.png
261 ms
banner1-content.png
802 ms
slider-png-1.jpg
492 ms
slider-png-2.jpg
782 ms
slider-comind-1.jpg
797 ms
slider-comind-2.jpg
741 ms
slider-cng-1.jpg
1003 ms
slider-cng-2.jpg
988 ms
banner1.jpg
1044 ms
banner2.jpg
1329 ms
banner3.jpg
1315 ms
bse.png
1234 ms
nse.png
1253 ms
pdf.png
1303 ms
bar-chart.png
1481 ms
new.gif
1508 ms
announce.png
1548 ms
leaf.png
1563 ms
cng-outlets1.png
1568 ms
scooter-icon.png
1594 ms
news.png
1726 ms
feedback.png
1761 ms
home.png
1807 ms
cng.png
1829 ms
industrial.png
1825 ms
commercial.png
1865 ms
feedback-icon.png
1971 ms
24-7call.png
2012 ms
24-7call-emergency.png
2065 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
91 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTaRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
91 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
122 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
123 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2043 ms
sep_on_white.png
2014 ms
midbanner.jpg
2049 ms
title-divider.png
1981 ms
arrow.png
2007 ms
sprite-default.png
2064 ms
sprite-clean.png
1843 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
520 ms
iglonline.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
iglonline.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
iglonline.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iglonline.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Iglonline.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
iglonline.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Iglonline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: