Tools & Wizards About Us
im-vergleich.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

im-vergleich.de

Versicherungen & Finanzen | im-Vergleich.de Rechner, Tests & Infos

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

207 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

476 ms

im-vergleich.de screenshot

About Website

Visit im-vergleich.de now to see the best up-to-date Im Vergleich content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about im-vergleich.de

Versicherungen und Finanzprodukte: Informationen, Tests, Vergleiche und kostenlose Angebote zu diversen Produkten!

Visit im-vergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Im-vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 207 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

im-vergleich.de performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

im-vergleich.de

207 ms

im-vergleich.de

445 ms

i181y.css

173 ms

i1961.css

435 ms

i181y.js

347 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Im-vergleich.de, 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (773 ms) belongs to the original domain Im-vergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 32.0 kB (59%)

Content Size

53.8 kB

After Optimization

21.8 kB

  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Im-vergleich.de main page is 53.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 53.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 53.8 kB
  • After minification 53.8 kB
  • After compression 21.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (33%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Im Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

im-vergleich.de

im-vergleich.de

207 ms

im-vergleich.de

im-vergleich.de

445 ms

i181y.css

i181y.css

173 ms

i1961.css

i1961.css

435 ms

i181y.js

i181y.js

347 ms

i181y.css

i181y.css

257 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

176 ms

jquery.fitvids.min.js

jquery.fitvids.min.js

174 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

255 ms

9-layout.js

9-layout.js

260 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

259 ms

js

js

50 ms

ubermenu.min.js

ubermenu.min.js

259 ms

jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js

jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js

339 ms

jquery.magnificpopup.min.js

jquery.magnificpopup.min.js

344 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

346 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

345 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

349 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

154 ms

versicherungen-testsieger-im-vergleich3-2.png

versicherungen-testsieger-im-vergleich3-2.png

181 ms

shutterstock_244918768.png

shutterstock_244918768.png

773 ms

shutterstock_176500799.png

shutterstock_176500799.png

440 ms

shutterstock_143060728-landscape.jpg

shutterstock_143060728-landscape.jpg

181 ms

shutterstock_1628591361-landscape.jpg

shutterstock_1628591361-landscape.jpg

183 ms

shutterstock_115144651-landscape.jpg

shutterstock_115144651-landscape.jpg

263 ms

shutterstock_114212785-landscape.jpg

shutterstock_114212785-landscape.jpg

265 ms

shutterstock_163414106-landscape.jpg

shutterstock_163414106-landscape.jpg

266 ms

shutterstock_59318719-landscape.jpg

shutterstock_59318719-landscape.jpg

266 ms

shutterstock_208845949-landscape.jpg

shutterstock_208845949-landscape.jpg

362 ms

shutterstock_192043844-landscape.jpg

shutterstock_192043844-landscape.jpg

362 ms

archive-150x150.png

archive-150x150.png

363 ms

bulb1-150x150.png

bulb1-150x150.png

363 ms

calculator1-150x150.png

calculator1-150x150.png

433 ms

consultant1-150x150.png

consultant1-150x150.png

434 ms

shutterstock_1467620212.jpg

shutterstock_1467620212.jpg

436 ms

im-vergleich1.png

im-vergleich1.png

435 ms

thumbsup_g-150x150.png

thumbsup_g-150x150.png

521 ms

secure_g1-150x150.png

secure_g1-150x150.png

521 ms

piggy_g-150x150.png

piggy_g-150x150.png

521 ms

qualitaet_sicherheit_200.png

qualitaet_sicherheit_200.png

521 ms

5stars160.png

5stars160.png

523 ms

feedback50.png

feedback50.png

602 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

511 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

596 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

607 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

516 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

5 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

collect

collect

31 ms

js

js

106 ms

Accessibility Review

im-vergleich.de accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

im-vergleich.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

im-vergleich.de SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Im-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Im-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

im-vergleich.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Im Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: