1.9 sec in total
88 ms
1.5 sec
315 ms
Click here to check amazing Indigowatch content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about indigowatch.com
Indigo
Visit indigowatch.comWe analyzed Indigowatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
indigowatch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value16.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.8 s
7/100
10%
Value490 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.233
54/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
88 ms
356 ms
65 ms
82 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Indigowatch.com, 16% (16 requests) were made to Indigo.replink.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (399 ms) relates to the external source Indigo.replink.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (58%)
3.9 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Indigowatch.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Indigowatch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 931.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 931.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indigowatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (84%)
81
13
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indigowatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
indigowatch.com
88 ms
indigowatch.com
356 ms
default.css
65 ms
content_slider_style.css
82 ms
magnific-popup.css
76 ms
owl.carousel.css
83 ms
pagepiling.css
95 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
138 ms
soon.min.css
141 ms
module.css
109 ms
SearchSkinObjectPreview.css
102 ms
skin.css
103 ms
homepage03.css
148 ms
container.css
118 ms
portal.css
120 ms
css
26 ms
Style.css
215 ms
jquery.mmenu.css
139 ms
jquery.js
153 ms
jquery-migrate.js
166 ms
jquery-ui.js
243 ms
WebResource.axd
156 ms
ScriptResource.axd
173 ms
ScriptResource.axd
169 ms
dnn.js
184 ms
dnn.modalpopup.js
184 ms
mobile-detect.min.js
191 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.merge.js
214 ms
vivus.min.js
213 ms
dnncore.js
213 ms
dnngo-ThemePlugin.js
216 ms
SearchSkinObjectPreview.js
232 ms
dnn.servicesframework.js
238 ms
bootstrap.min.js
236 ms
jquery.content_slider.min.js
229 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
223 ms
easyResponsiveTabs.js
249 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
242 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
240 ms
google.map.js
213 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
201 ms
jquery.pagepiling.min.js
209 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
206 ms
soon.min.js
194 ms
dnngo.js
206 ms
css
12 ms
dnngo-font-icon.css
197 ms
bootstrap.css
228 ms
skin.css
190 ms
shortcodes.css
196 ms
page.css
188 ms
header_normal.css
186 ms
custom.js
192 ms
accordions.css
177 ms
blockquotes.css
180 ms
button.css
188 ms
carousel.css
180 ms
chart.css
171 ms
clients.css
173 ms
css3-animation.css
175 ms
flip-box.css
171 ms
form_style.css
161 ms
icon-box.css
152 ms
imagebox.css
164 ms
number.css
148 ms
ourteam.css
157 ms
portfolios.css
170 ms
pricing.css
154 ms
promo-boxes.css
143 ms
tabs.css
148 ms
testimonial.css
157 ms
mov-banner-black.jpg
81 ms
bulovahero.jpg
81 ms
CoachBanner.jpg
81 ms
casio_gshock_1.jpg
80 ms
Citizen_Banner.jpg
80 ms
nambe_banner.jpg
155 ms
movadobrand%20banner-03%20copy.jpg
156 ms
bulovabrandbanner.jpg
157 ms
logo-indigo.png
35 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
102 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff
102 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff
103 ms
dnngo.ttf
99 ms
CoachBanner.jpg
393 ms
mov-banner-black.jpg
376 ms
casio_gshock_1.jpg
391 ms
bulovahero.jpg
391 ms
Citizen_Banner.jpg
395 ms
nambe_banner.jpg
318 ms
movadobrand%20banner-03%20copy.jpg
399 ms
bulovabrandbanner.jpg
397 ms
loader.gif
105 ms
js
91 ms
timer.png
27 ms
undefined
83 ms
revicons.woff
35 ms
indigowatch.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
indigowatch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
indigowatch.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indigowatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Indigowatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
indigowatch.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Indigowatch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: