9.7 sec in total
3 sec
6.4 sec
345 ms
Click here to check amazing Infoeye content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about infoeye.com
https://infoeye.com/
Visit infoeye.comWe analyzed Infoeye.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
infoeye.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value8.5 s
18/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.035
100/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
2959 ms
395 ms
635 ms
434 ms
660 ms
Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Infoeye.com, 9% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 4% (4 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Infoeye.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (67%)
2.2 MB
740.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Infoeye.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 840.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 472.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Infoeye needs image optimization as it can save up to 472.3 kB or 56% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 492.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 492.8 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 497.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infoeye.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 497.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 82 (73%)
112
30
The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infoeye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
infoeye.com
2959 ms
flexslider.css
395 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
635 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
434 ms
prettyPhoto.min.css
660 ms
font-awesome.min.css
11 ms
ut-responsive-grid.min.css
660 ms
ut.table.style.min.css
592 ms
ut.animate.min.css
1113 ms
ut.elastislide.min.css
665 ms
ut.fancyrotator.min.css
1030 ms
ut.shortcode.min.css
1096 ms
ut.twitter.css
914 ms
002.css
1327 ms
styles.css
908 ms
settings.css
1348 ms
jetpack.css
1343 ms
jquery.js
1743 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1291 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1490 ms
master.js
1482 ms
footerFixed.js
1520 ms
jquery.flatheights.js
1505 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1924 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1829 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1647 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
1681 ms
modernizr.min.js
1903 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
1841 ms
jquery.elastislide.min.js
1879 ms
jquery.innerfade.js
1885 ms
swfobject.js
2025 ms
js
28 ms
css
25 ms
style_bizvektor_options.css
1884 ms
gMenu_divide_7.css
1907 ms
style.css
1898 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1750 ms
bookmark_button.js
349 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1773 ms
scripts.js
1836 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
1845 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
gprofiles.js
62 ms
e-201611.js
14 ms
plusone.js
51 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
1920 ms
tabs.collapse.min.js
1766 ms
jquery.visible.min.js
1749 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
1762 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
1800 ms
ut.scplugin.min.js
1809 ms
wpgroho.js
1572 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1614 ms
ga.js
5 ms
__utm.gif
34 ms
collect
55 ms
__utm.gif
28 ms
bnr_shopeyeips.png
1259 ms
logo.gif
942 ms
button-only.gif
228 ms
infoeye_a_f.png
881 ms
prg_20150807.jpg
686 ms
gtry_05.jpg
1302 ms
asrabbit.jpg
940 ms
top02.png
937 ms
top01.png
1482 ms
bnr_rpt.png
1098 ms
bnr_contact.png
1061 ms
bnr_facebook.png
1076 ms
bnr_twitter.png
1140 ms
all.js
222 ms
fn_K76YUt-k
119 ms
bg_gr_up.png
1258 ms
iconMenuOpen.png
1247 ms
arrow_gray.png
1291 ms
line_grd.png
1314 ms
arrow_bk_s.png
1435 ms
line_wh.png
1462 ms
widgets.js
159 ms
icon_arrow_top_gry.png
1427 ms
bg_bk.jpg
1441 ms
arrow_gray_s.png
1454 ms
0sh94cllXTY
100 ms
245 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
30 ms
www-embed-player.js
47 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
60 ms
ad_status.js
89 ms
71 ms
xd_arbiter.php
209 ms
xd_arbiter.php
329 ms
reset.css
18 ms
entry-button.css
19 ms
button-counter.gif
13 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
74 ms
hovercard.css
64 ms
services.css
85 ms
ping
74 ms
g.gif
16 ms
like_box.php
59 ms
like.php
74 ms
X6KlzAHXBpN.css
186 ms
HrxJFtc4t_E.css
214 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
292 ms
ehA1CqzHyzE.js
314 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
229 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
235 ms
wy1X4hBW7e7.js
333 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
205 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
44 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
79 ms
bg_control_nav.png
209 ms
bg_direction_nav2_30.png
186 ms
infoeye.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
infoeye.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
infoeye.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infoeye.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infoeye.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
infoeye.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Infoeye. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: