3 sec in total
377 ms
2.1 sec
500 ms
Visit inputselector.fr now to see the best up-to-date Input Selector content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inputselector.fr
L'équipe d'Input Selector défriche pour vous la musique élctronique : électro, deep, house, techno, hip-hop à travers des articles, des podcasts, interview, et focus sur des labels.
Visit inputselector.frWe analyzed Inputselector.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 377 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
inputselector.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value7.9 s
22/100
10%
Value1,230 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.09
92/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
377 ms
278 ms
14 ms
257 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Inputselector.fr, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 404.0 kB (31%)
1.3 MB
879.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Inputselector.fr main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 805.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Input Selector images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 154.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 154.7 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 145.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inputselector.fr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 145.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (52%)
62
30
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Input Selector. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
inputselector.fr
377 ms
www.inputselector.fr
278 ms
style.css
14 ms
widget.css
257 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
15 ms
styles.css
311 ms
wpp.css
95 ms
shiftnav.min.css
84 ms
font-awesome.min.css
307 ms
standard-dark.css
12 ms
featured-post.css
184 ms
font-awesome.min.css
248 ms
mobile.css
94 ms
camera.css
266 ms
jquery.min.js
17 ms
tabs.js
278 ms
jquery.custom.js
246 ms
pace.js
33 ms
jquery.tubular.1.0.js
248 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
419 ms
custom-style.css
250 ms
jquery.form.min.js
253 ms
scripts.js
416 ms
shiftnav.min.js
470 ms
jquery.validationEngine-fr.js
277 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
278 ms
front-subscribers.js
478 ms
css
24 ms
default.css
306 ms
extras.css
307 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
35 ms
iframe_api
24 ms
www-widgetapi.js
6 ms
ga.js
43 ms
12814799_1092846684071960_3889075687681648891_n.png
1009 ms
logoW.png
226 ms
IS-278-Keumel-Jekyll-et-Hyde-620x413.jpg
326 ms
IS-277-Denis-Dmitriev-300x300.jpg
220 ms
camera-loader.gif
224 ms
IS-276-K.atou_-300x300.jpg
225 ms
nathan-oye-300x214.jpg
222 ms
icon-date.png
330 ms
Fernando-Costantini-300x200.jpg
336 ms
Reggy-van-Oers-Press-Pic-300x449.jpg
341 ms
Sebastian-Mullaert-300x212.jpg
343 ms
Flavio-Folco-300x200.jpg
353 ms
Chi-The-Original-Recordings-Astral-Industries-300x305.jpg
495 ms
fachwerk-300x150.jpg
504 ms
12710806_911270712327680_7670131696099870168_o-150x150.jpg
575 ms
12829045_932277496891064_2606075312088910466_o-150x150.jpg
502 ms
12768127_1013558928724893_1088052659386084573_o-150x150.jpg
504 ms
12733383_1544438429182254_8234627834543790361_n-150x150.jpg
522 ms
fr-0312-812936-711061-back-150x150.jpg
661 ms
1558425_1058466174213120_2072795686565367687_n-150x150.jpg
666 ms
12419128_999193120174196_3368276839694249078_o-150x150.jpg
591 ms
1501352_1016955115051941_9096585752957429502_o-150x150.jpg
667 ms
logoFooter.jpg
693 ms
analytics.js
127 ms
sdk.js
83 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
525 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
645 ms
__utm.gif
69 ms
138 ms
collect
67 ms
xd_arbiter.php
40 ms
xd_arbiter.php
46 ms
collect
58 ms
inputselector.fr accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
inputselector.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
inputselector.fr SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inputselector.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inputselector.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inputselector.fr
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Input Selector. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: