5.9 sec in total
477 ms
5.3 sec
94 ms
Visit iral.it now to see the best up-to-date IRAL content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about iral.it
Al servizio della qualità. Da oltre 50 anni professionisti nella progettazione, produzione e installazione impianti di ventilazione e areazione
Visit iral.itWe analyzed Iral.it page load time and found that the first response time was 477 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
iral.it performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value9.4 s
0/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value1,430 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.286
42/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
477 ms
2716 ms
461 ms
1659 ms
353 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Iral.it, 14% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Iral.it.
Page size can be reduced by 94.7 kB (15%)
613.3 kB
518.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Iral.it main page is 613.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 287.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, IRAL needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 547 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Iral.it has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (93%)
70
5
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IRAL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 53 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
iral.it
477 ms
www.iral.it
2716 ms
autoptimize_48e710d4e2d11e020c7550bc7205f82e.css
461 ms
css
1659 ms
autoptimize_single_ada9dddc09e5757f702429ae4fb2d8fc.css
353 ms
css2
56 ms
css2
60 ms
css2
57 ms
css2
56 ms
css
60 ms
css2
72 ms
css2
73 ms
autoptimize_single_8bd787c76ee860a3bf9a90b07926d2db.css
361 ms
css
74 ms
jquery.min.js
547 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
373 ms
autoptimize_single_499db98b42fe6285b5a5b5dda362f0dd.js
369 ms
autoptimize_single_d0b82dee3c8616dcbf8ab685b1e7dc0d.css
546 ms
css
73 ms
swiper.min.js
664 ms
autoptimize_single_efb135586dff92a526f01bd092e791fa.js
545 ms
slick.min.js
574 ms
autoptimize_single_4937b9d0b9ad3e3f786fb35a92301ed8.js
613 ms
autoptimize_single_6a2a2a92646858afabfff092d378a5f4.js
621 ms
autoptimize_single_d3bd804f68d06923268aaf4921e20a17.js
664 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
673 ms
autoptimize_single_40e34ec746515f70103fb11ce574dc7b.js
692 ms
autoptimize_single_e9fd2fc65b21df7bf35704e0c5b318cb.js
733 ms
autoptimize_single_aad33df73d347c7f8e66b2dbdee849b5.js
745 ms
autoptimize_single_ebce647610cb2bcd8f2917a59dd169f1.js
788 ms
hooks.min.js
814 ms
i18n.min.js
813 ms
autoptimize_single_2e187162915b1d22fd4558fee30f5613.js
859 ms
autoptimize_single_2912c657d0592cc532dff73d0d2ce7bb.js
868 ms
autoptimize_single_f79dd95e32640b1781624d475588e084.js
925 ms
swiper.min.js
964 ms
wow.min.js
933 ms
autoptimize_single_7e97e59f8474f714ff309ded869c0ea4.js
941 ms
bootstrap.min.js
979 ms
effect.min.js
1000 ms
autoptimize_single_0bed697d22c8aa04c290f5e12a10928a.js
1049 ms
pace.min.js
1053 ms
autoptimize_single_f13a882556a48d71f94d25e7d68ebbdd.js
1061 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1089 ms
autoptimize_single_fe74e88da4e4f7fc8d538fa300713c2b.js
1113 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1131 ms
slick.min.js
830 ms
autoptimize_single_4937b9d0b9ad3e3f786fb35a92301ed8.js
817 ms
ResizeSensor.min.js
821 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js
851 ms
svgembedder.min.js
701 ms
autoptimize_single_4133747b3f14b2f3febc93c59e91795e.js
718 ms
autoptimize_single_b6522b6c21007774035427de9dd38dd4.js
750 ms
splitting.min.js
758 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
761 ms
autoptimize_single_f1f1f790ed4569588b0f3ed2c590bf32.js
774 ms
simpleParallax.min.js
752 ms
waypoints.min.js
765 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
752 ms
autoptimize_single_01c84aa4798894b0a9c9b5582b2d2762.js
764 ms
wow.min.js
764 ms
autoptimize_single_e9105274247eb5f6038ca5eb97119338.js
780 ms
autoptimize_single_ab6d7e8c2523a4f52fa426ce29e62e84.js
753 ms
complianz.min.js
767 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
747 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
754 ms
core.min.js
771 ms
frontend.min.js
785 ms
gtm.js
99 ms
Iral-Logo.png
121 ms
50_-removebg-preview-pe42aqqveru0z5qn2oqsjpnmv3n7ki4lrhixgzb1dk.png
125 ms
font
49 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
356 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
368 ms
iral.it accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
iral.it best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
iral.it SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iral.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Italian language. Our system also found out that Iral.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
iral.it
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IRAL. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: