3.6 sec in total
559 ms
2.6 sec
465 ms
Visit jamesdaphne.com now to see the best up-to-date Jamesdaphne content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jamesdaphne.com
Visit jamesdaphne.comWe analyzed Jamesdaphne.com page load time and found that the first response time was 559 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
jamesdaphne.com performance score
559 ms
415 ms
312 ms
40 ms
659 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jamesdaphne.com, 77% (24 requests) were made to Pau.pw and 13% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Pau.pw.
Page size can be reduced by 230.6 kB (10%)
2.2 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Jamesdaphne.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jamesdaphne images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 125.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 94.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamesdaphne.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 94.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (50%)
26
13
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jamesdaphne. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jamesdaphne.com
559 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
415 ms
style.css
312 ms
css
40 ms
jquery.js
659 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
327 ms
masonry.min.js
452 ms
bootstrap.js
341 ms
imagesloaded.js
417 ms
js
55 ms
smooth-scroll.js
440 ms
fitvids.js
463 ms
cvcard-custom.js
520 ms
bootstrap.css
217 ms
font-awesome.css
246 ms
style.css
260 ms
wreathe_l.jpg
488 ms
loader.gif
106 ms
fruit_l.jpg
531 ms
F_6_l.jpg
337 ms
E_5_l.jpg
798 ms
D_6_l.jpg
784 ms
C_2_l.jpg
807 ms
B_5_l.jpg
668 ms
A_6_l.jpg
1333 ms
Lion.jpg
735 ms
stream_l.jpg
1003 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
50 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
49 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
50 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
50 ms
jamesdaphne.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamesdaphne.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jamesdaphne.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jamesdaphne.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jamesdaphne. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: