5.1 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.4 sec
507 ms
Welcome to johneday.com homepage info - get ready to check Johneday best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about johneday.com
for thoughts greater than 140 characters...
Visit johneday.comWe analyzed Johneday.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
johneday.com performance score
1228 ms
364 ms
166 ms
291 ms
451 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Johneday.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Paypalobjects.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Johneday.com.
Page size can be reduced by 300.7 kB (59%)
508.7 kB
208.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Johneday.com main page is 508.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 273.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Johneday needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 169.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 169.9 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johneday.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (70%)
64
19
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Johneday. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.johneday.com
1228 ms
style.css
364 ms
layout.css
166 ms
generator.php
291 ms
jquery.js
451 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
163 ms
third-party.js
1272 ms
slides.min.jquery.js
300 ms
feedback.js
408 ms
general.js
409 ms
shortcodes.css
489 ms
custom.css
490 ms
johneday.json
179 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
159 ms
shCore.js
430 ms
shBrushAS3.js
129 ms
shBrushBash.js
130 ms
shBrushColdFusion.js
130 ms
shBrushClojure.js
220 ms
shBrushCpp.js
225 ms
shBrushCSharp.js
631 ms
shBrushCss.js
707 ms
shBrushDelphi.js
318 ms
shBrushDiff.js
325 ms
shBrushErlang.js
396 ms
shBrushFSharp.js
405 ms
shBrushGroovy.js
492 ms
shBrushJava.js
498 ms
shBrushJavaFX.js
512 ms
shBrushJScript.js
594 ms
shBrushLatex.js
602 ms
shBrushMatlabKey.js
612 ms
shBrushObjC.js
678 ms
shBrushPerl.js
683 ms
shBrushPhp.js
689 ms
shBrushPlain.js
702 ms
shBrushPowerShell.js
757 ms
shBrushPython.js
767 ms
shBrushR.js
769 ms
shBrushRuby.js
772 ms
shBrushScala.js
776 ms
shBrushSql.js
807 ms
shBrushVb.js
818 ms
shBrushXml.js
818 ms
shBrushAppleScript.js
814 ms
wp-embed.min.js
804 ms
1225729.png
161 ms
btn_donate_SM.gif
334 ms
twitter.png
157 ms
linkedin.png
158 ms
subscribe.png
164 ms
rss.png
163 ms
reference_selected_events-100x93.png
155 ms
thumb.php
558 ms
alfred_icon-100x100.png
331 ms
google-apps-script-100x100.png
179 ms
imgur_service2-100x100.png
555 ms
jed124-100x100.png
178 ms
jed31-100x100.png
329 ms
rss.png
340 ms
woothemes.png
338 ms
pixel.gif
325 ms
ga.js
94 ms
shCore.css
214 ms
shThemeAppleScript.css
214 ms
__utm.gif
247 ms
johneday.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johneday.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Johneday.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
johneday.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Johneday. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: