10.7 sec in total
609 ms
9.5 sec
579 ms
Click here to check amazing Joomstax content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about joomstax.com
日本多人强伦姧人妻完整版,久久青青草原亚洲AV无码,色老头O|DMANVIDE0S,久久九九久精品国产日韩经典,欧美亚洲综合久久偷偷人人,欧美性爽XYXOOOO,久久精品中文字幕有码
Visit joomstax.comWe analyzed Joomstax.com page load time and found that the first response time was 609 ms and then it took 10.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
joomstax.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value0
0/100
10%
609 ms
1258 ms
148 ms
567 ms
880 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Joomstax.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Joomstax.com.
Page size can be reduced by 564.6 kB (50%)
1.1 MB
570.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Joomstax.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 480.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Joomstax needs image optimization as it can save up to 66.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 329.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 329.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 140.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joomstax.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 140.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (54%)
71
33
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joomstax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
joomstax.com
609 ms
www.joomstax.com
1258 ms
css
148 ms
reset.css
567 ms
font-awesome.css
880 ms
style.css
1506 ms
style-new.css
1202 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
1646 ms
fancy-radio.css
2119 ms
html5.js
860 ms
jquery-1.4.3.min.js
1599 ms
custom_jquery.js
1124 ms
overalljs.js
1420 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
1690 ms
livechat.js
1663 ms
responsive.css
1750 ms
layerSlider.css
1847 ms
jquery-ui.js
2924 ms
layerslider.js
2228 ms
jquery.filestyle.js
1937 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
1993 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
2097 ms
countUp.min.js
2227 ms
analytics.js
52 ms
dmca_protected_sml_120n.png
45 ms
quick_contact.png
429 ms
logo.png
575 ms
wordprex-laptop.png
1075 ms
gravity-forms.png
261 ms
custom-wp-plugins.png
355 ms
buddy-press-themes.png
613 ms
genesis-framework.png
684 ms
theme-Development.png
960 ms
woo-commerce.png
962 ms
customize.png
958 ms
admin.png
999 ms
feature.png
1014 ms
support.png
1104 ms
face-sliced.jpg
1419 ms
faces-2.png
2193 ms
faces-3.png
1754 ms
faces-4.png
1559 ms
home_example1.jpg
1373 ms
share.png
1369 ms
home_example2.jpg
1867 ms
home_example3.jpg
1856 ms
home_example4.jpg
2196 ms
home_example5.jpg
1897 ms
fi6.png
1998 ms
fi8.png
2094 ms
fi1.png
2123 ms
fi4.png
2159 ms
fi5.png
2309 ms
fi2.png
2380 ms
google-like-button
2368 ms
tweet-like-button.png
2413 ms
fb-like-button.png
2453 ms
breuertext-regular-webfont.woff
2727 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
29 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
30 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
42 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
42 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
47 ms
breuertext-medium-webfont.woff
2778 ms
breuertext-bold-webfont.woff
2854 ms
collect
23 ms
home-bg.jpg
3280 ms
quotes.png
1897 ms
gray-patch.png
2192 ms
tbv.png
2149 ms
tbh.png
2225 ms
home-bg2.jpg
3040 ms
skin.css
2245 ms
facebook-foot.png
2275 ms
tweet-foot.png
2320 ms
HelveticaCE-Regular.woff
2561 ms
7m8l7TlFO-S3VkhHuR0at50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
8 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2894 ms
HelveticaCE-Bold.woff
2533 ms
protected.png
2503 ms
footer-logo.png
2698 ms
prev-bottom.png
2494 ms
next-bottom.png
2639 ms
www.joomstax.com
690 ms
www.joomstax.com
939 ms
joomstax.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
joomstax.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
joomstax.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joomstax.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Joomstax.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
joomstax.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joomstax. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: