Tools & Wizards About Us
klarm.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

klarm.com

Lighted Makeup Mirror | Bathroom Hardware China Factory

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

281 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

137 ms

klarm.com screenshot

About Website

Visit klarm.com now to see the best up-to-date Klarm content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about klarm.com

Chinese manufacturer and supplier of LED magnifying mirror, cosmetic vanity mirrors with lights, bathroom fittings, bath sets and home accessories in China.

Visit klarm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Klarm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 281 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

klarm.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

klarm.com

281 ms

www.klarm.com

1440 ms

master.css

216 ms

allscripts.js

366 ms

homescripts.js

307 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Klarm.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Klarm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 146.8 kB (35%)

Content Size

423.3 kB

After Optimization

276.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Klarm.com main page is 423.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 245.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 10.2 kB
  • After minification 9.2 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 16.0 kB

  • Original 245.3 kB
  • After minification 229.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Klarm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 109.8 kB

  • Original 150.1 kB
  • After minification 139.2 kB
  • After compression 40.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

  • Original 17.7 kB
  • After minification 17.3 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Klarm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Klarm. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

klarm.com

klarm.com

281 ms

www.klarm.com

www.klarm.com

1440 ms

master.css

master.css

216 ms

allscripts.js

allscripts.js

366 ms

homescripts.js

homescripts.js

307 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

133 ms

nav_home.jpg

nav_home.jpg

120 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

136 ms

nav_about.jpg

nav_about.jpg

162 ms

nav_factory.jpg

nav_factory.jpg

200 ms

nav_cert.jpg

nav_cert.jpg

194 ms

nav_product.jpg

nav_product.jpg

256 ms

nav_services.jpg

nav_services.jpg

277 ms

nav_env.jpg

nav_env.jpg

249 ms

nav_contact.jpg

nav_contact.jpg

363 ms

banner_1.jpg

banner_1.jpg

420 ms

banner_2.jpg

banner_2.jpg

500 ms

banner_3.jpg

banner_3.jpg

457 ms

banner_4.jpg

banner_4.jpg

405 ms

google.png

google.png

406 ms

facebook.gif

facebook.gif

466 ms

twitter.gif

twitter.gif

548 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

525 ms

blog.jpg

blog.jpg

589 ms

nav_env_h.jpg

nav_env_h.jpg

117 ms

nav_home_h.jpg

nav_home_h.jpg

206 ms

nav_services_h.jpg

nav_services_h.jpg

170 ms

nav_contact_h.jpg

nav_contact_h.jpg

148 ms

nav_product_h.jpg

nav_product_h.jpg

146 ms

nav_about_h.jpg

nav_about_h.jpg

117 ms

nav_factory_h.jpg

nav_factory_h.jpg

220 ms

nav_cert_h.jpg

nav_cert_h.jpg

219 ms

Accessibility Review

klarm.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

klarm.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

klarm.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Klarm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Klarm.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

klarm.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Klarm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: