7.2 sec in total
1.1 sec
5.9 sec
172 ms
Click here to check amazing Label 42 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about label42.com
Studio de post-production et création audiovisuelle à Marseille / montage image, sound design, enregistrement ADR, mixage, étalonnage, VFX, DCP, PAD, Labo
Visit label42.comWe analyzed Label42.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
label42.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value77.5 s
0/100
25%
Value46.7 s
0/100
10%
Value1,770 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.027
100/100
15%
Value48.7 s
0/100
10%
1134 ms
168 ms
68 ms
201 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Label42.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Label42.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (28%)
5.7 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Label42.com main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Label 42 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 830.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 830.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 613.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Label42.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 613.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (60%)
55
22
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Label 42. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.label42.com
1134 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
168 ms
css
68 ms
styles.css
201 ms
css
82 ms
rgs.css
172 ms
font-awesome.min.css
277 ms
style.css
447 ms
responsive.css
282 ms
js_composer.css
267 ms
jquery.js
424 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
299 ms
modernizr.js
366 ms
box-roll.css
317 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
343 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
337 ms
core.min.js
658 ms
widget.min.js
658 ms
position.min.js
660 ms
menu.min.js
658 ms
autocomplete.min.js
659 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
660 ms
jquery.form.min.js
678 ms
scripts.js
679 ms
respond.js
680 ms
sticky.js
677 ms
prettyPhoto.js
681 ms
isotope.min.js
680 ms
superfish.js
680 ms
init.js
1114 ms
vivus.min.js
681 ms
comment-reply.min.js
740 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
741 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
741 ms
js_composer_front.js
770 ms
analytics.js
193 ms
logo_l42.png
207 ms
loading-white-bg.gif
365 ms
fond_portfolio.jpg
1400 ms
diagonal_line.png
366 ms
FullSizeRender.jpg
3279 ms
logo_l42_studio.png
364 ms
no-portfolio-item-tiny.jpg
459 ms
vignette_lpb1-500x1000.jpg
1399 ms
transparent.png
464 ms
SNCF_Titre_film_v02_00325-1000x500.jpg
1400 ms
vignette_redcastle.jpg
1400 ms
Ananke-500x500.png
1401 ms
GC-500x500.png
1403 ms
no-portfolio-item-wide.jpg
1398 ms
Europann2-500x899.png
1818 ms
vignette_pain_de_sucre1-500x500.jpg
1401 ms
vignette_btm2-500x500.jpg
1318 ms
simple-smile.png
1316 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
1289 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
247 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
1290 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
272 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
1289 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
272 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
1355 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
272 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
269 ms
icomoon.woff
1540 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1352 ms
collect
191 ms
label42.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
label42.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
label42.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Label42.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Label42.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
label42.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Label 42. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: