Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

lifescan.fr

OneTouch® | Lecteurs de Glycémie, Bandelettes réactives & Gestion de diabète

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

613 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

549 ms

lifescan.fr screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lifescan.fr homepage info - get ready to check Lifescan best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about lifescan.fr

OneTouch® s’engage à améliorer la vie des personnes diabétiques par le biais de ses produits et de son services. Apprenez-en davantage à notre sujet ici.

Visit lifescan.fr

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifescan.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 613 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifescan.fr performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,200 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.059

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.gammeonetouch.fr

613 ms

otSDKStub.js

42 ms

google_tag.script.js

25 ms

css_4WBa4S8rqRTuqTJPjPh1kqN_b6nO0UowVNuUKjoHNLw.css

21 ms

css_hBoEOCDGFcdOOqUPOZqVmnoRBdEMEl5q2KRo8YNDbsU.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Lifescan.fr, 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (613 ms) relates to the external source Gammeonetouch.fr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 825.8 kB (15%)

Content Size

5.4 MB

After Optimization

4.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Lifescan.fr main page is 5.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 290.8 kB

  • Original 341.8 kB
  • After minification 299.1 kB
  • After compression 51.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 42.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 290.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 107.6 kB

  • Original 4.0 MB
  • After minification 3.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifescan images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 397.1 kB

  • Original 872.0 kB
  • After minification 872.0 kB
  • After compression 474.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 397.1 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 30.2 kB

  • Original 116.4 kB
  • After minification 116.4 kB
  • After compression 86.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifescan.fr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.2 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (25%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

40

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifescan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lifescan.fr accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

lifescan.fr best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

lifescan.fr SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifescan.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifescan.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifescan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: