5.5 sec in total
1.9 sec
3.3 sec
356 ms
Visit lunchbeat.org now to see the best up-to-date Lunch Beat content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lunchbeat.org
Visit lunchbeat.orgWe analyzed Lunchbeat.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
lunchbeat.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.06
98/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
1853 ms
327 ms
219 ms
367 ms
231 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Lunchbeat.org, 31% (10 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Lunchbeat.org.
Page size can be reduced by 194.6 kB (44%)
442.1 kB
247.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Lunchbeat.org main page is 442.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 200.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 998 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lunch Beat images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 123.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 123.6 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lunchbeat.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (57%)
30
13
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lunch Beat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lunchbeat.org
1853 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
327 ms
framework.css
219 ms
style.css
367 ms
instapress.css
231 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
229 ms
jquery.js
649 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
342 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
456 ms
modernizr.min.js
433 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
455 ms
helper.js
475 ms
script.js
542 ms
gigpress.js
568 ms
gigpress.css
569 ms
widgets.js
23 ms
league_gothic-webfont.woff
111 ms
1209497_1050206365036693_1175034737_n.jpg
114 ms
1169063_1691195114483554_864014472_n.jpg
222 ms
12784107_203818156644814_1084307631_n.jpg
259 ms
12825793_864390473669493_1530975396_n.jpg
309 ms
12383476_197227230640413_204544620_n.jpg
257 ms
12751227_664140847059250_2084238944_n.jpg
266 ms
12724804_1733764480189844_1133835602_n.jpg
266 ms
12716457_1746610518917705_2055898196_n.jpg
267 ms
instapress.js
112 ms
wp-embed.min.js
111 ms
comment-reply.min.js
116 ms
12747571_910524969066407_1424574098_n.jpg
354 ms
12728644_208010246218515_869662957_n.jpg
290 ms
ga.js
5 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
lunchbeat.org accessibility score
lunchbeat.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lunchbeat.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
SV
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lunchbeat.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Swedish language. Our system also found out that Lunchbeat.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lunchbeat.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lunch Beat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: