4.5 sec in total
278 ms
2.2 sec
2.1 sec
Visit map.missouri.edu now to see the best up-to-date Map Missouri content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about map.missouri.edu
MU, Mizzou, University of Missouri, Campus Map
Visit map.missouri.eduWe analyzed Map.missouri.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 278 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
map.missouri.edu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value26.2 s
0/100
25%
Value19.0 s
0/100
10%
Value2,230 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.138
79/100
15%
Value25.3 s
0/100
10%
278 ms
283 ms
290 ms
107 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Map.missouri.edu, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (649 ms) relates to the external source Mu-cf-map.col.missouri.edu.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (73%)
1.7 MB
458.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Map.missouri.edu main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Map Missouri needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 52% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 943.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 943.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 270.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Map.missouri.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 270.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (84%)
96
15
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Map Missouri. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 71 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
map.missouri.edu
278 ms
claro_3-6.css
283 ms
esri.css
290 ms
Popup.css
107 ms
css
25 ms
moduleStyles.css
106 ms
dgrid.css
108 ms
mapWidgetStyles.css
102 ms
MapToc.css
138 ms
printfriendly.css
140 ms
mobile.css
140 ms
js
46 ms
initMU.js
497 ms
mapscript.js
206 ms
jsapi_en-us.js
89 ms
mapWidget.js
46 ms
FeaturePanel.js
46 ms
TOCLegendPanel.js
71 ms
CustomPanel.js
107 ms
PrintMap.js
46 ms
Memory.js
62 ms
TitlePane.js
71 ms
svg.js
71 ms
mu-sig.png
53 ms
print.gif
74 ms
loading.gif
81 ms
zoom-in.png
89 ms
backarrow.png
89 ms
fwdarrow.png
90 ms
zoom-full-extent1.png
109 ms
LeFlHvsZjXu2c3ZRgBq9nKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
31 ms
FeatureLayer.js
118 ms
Scalebar.js
84 ms
Toolbar.js
84 ms
TabContainer.js
84 ms
_Contained.js
85 ms
QueryResults.js
108 ms
SimpleQueryEngine.js
131 ms
TocWidgetMin.js
124 ms
FilteringSelect.js
85 ms
OnDemandGrid.js
86 ms
Selection.js
96 ms
Keyboard.js
102 ms
DijitRegistry.js
103 ms
TocWidget.js
104 ms
panelTemplate.html
104 ms
_KeyNavContainer.js
74 ms
_TabContainerBase.js
97 ms
TabController.js
102 ms
ScrollingTabController.js
105 ms
FeatureType.js
72 ms
FeatureTemplate.js
74 ms
FeatureEditResult.js
75 ms
SnapshotMode.js
99 ms
OnDemandMode.js
104 ms
SelectionMode.js
105 ms
TrackManager.js
106 ms
CheckBox.js
90 ms
MappedTextBox.js
92 ms
ComboBoxMixin.js
116 ms
Grid.js
121 ms
OnDemandList.js
122 ms
List.js
116 ms
touch.js
117 ms
put.js
117 ms
_KeyNavMixin.js
132 ms
StackContainer.js
113 ms
StackController.js
108 ms
Menu.js
109 ms
MenuItem.js
110 ms
RenderMode.js
82 ms
GridLayout.js
102 ms
_CheckBoxMixin.js
112 ms
_AutoCompleterMixin.js
85 ms
_ComboBoxMenu.js
85 ms
misc.js
80 ms
_StoreMixin.js
79 ms
TouchScroll.js
115 ms
has-class.js
104 ms
css.js
105 ms
_LayoutWidget.js
74 ms
DropDownMenu.js
75 ms
DataList.js
38 ms
_SearchMixin.js
61 ms
_ComboBoxMenuMixin.js
62 ms
_ListMouseMixin.js
64 ms
_MenuBase.js
36 ms
has-css3.js
51 ms
load-css.js
47 ms
ComboBox.js
37 ms
_ListBase.js
37 ms
TouchScroll.css
51 ms
has-transforms3d.css
37 ms
query
649 ms
spriteArrows.png
37 ms
buttonArrows.png
39 ms
checkmarkNoBorder.png
38 ms
link.png
39 ms
map.missouri.edu accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
map.missouri.edu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
map.missouri.edu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Map.missouri.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Map.missouri.edu main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
map.missouri.edu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Map Missouri. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: