Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

masterton.ru

Оборудование и технологии для рекламного и сувенирного бизнеса, сублимации и термопереноса в Москве | Masterton.ru

Page Load Speed

9.6 sec in total

First Response

691 ms

Resources Loaded

8.3 sec

Page Rendered

650 ms

masterton.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Masterton content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about masterton.ru

Компания РуссКом осуществляет продажи оптом и в розницу оборудования для рекламного и сувенирного бизнеса.

Visit masterton.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Masterton.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 691 ms and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

masterton.ru performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.093

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

masterton.ru

691 ms

masterton.ru

419 ms

kernel_main.css

308 ms

page_f09cd1753a005f6a451a18a89f4526c9.css

308 ms

template_a4e3b9eae67359ec05adfdf6c22aa3c5.css

301 ms

Our browser made a total of 142 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (106 requests) were addressed to the original Masterton.ru, 7% (10 requests) were made to W.uptolike.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.4 sec) relates to the external source Vk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (34%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Masterton.ru main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 147.8 kB

  • Original 177.3 kB
  • After minification 176.0 kB
  • After compression 29.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 147.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 253.1 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Masterton needs image optimization as it can save up to 253.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 652.9 kB

  • Original 869.8 kB
  • After minification 758.7 kB
  • After compression 216.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 652.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 158.5 kB

  • Original 182.4 kB
  • After minification 161.1 kB
  • After compression 23.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Masterton.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 158.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (43%)

Requests Now

132

After Optimization

75

The browser has sent 132 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Masterton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

masterton.ru accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

masterton.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

masterton.ru SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Masterton.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Masterton.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Masterton. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: