6.3 sec in total
1.2 sec
4.5 sec
626 ms
Click here to check amazing NEXTSTEPFOUNDATION content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nextstepfoundation.org
Visit nextstepfoundation.orgWe analyzed Nextstepfoundation.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
nextstepfoundation.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value9.5 s
11/100
10%
Value1,600 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value21.2 s
1/100
10%
1201 ms
73 ms
134 ms
203 ms
207 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Nextstepfoundation.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Nextstepfoundation.org.
Page size can be reduced by 111.3 kB (13%)
867.7 kB
756.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Nextstepfoundation.org main page is 867.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 363.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 96.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NEXTSTEPFOUNDATION images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nextstepfoundation.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (78%)
68
15
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NEXTSTEPFOUNDATION. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nextstepfoundation.org
1201 ms
custom-color-overrides.css
73 ms
styles.css
134 ms
smoothness-jquery-ui.min.css
203 ms
ec-store.css
207 ms
css
29 ms
owl.carousel.css
185 ms
dashicons.min.css
197 ms
ie.css
188 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
232 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
320 ms
swiper.min.css
330 ms
post-5.css
325 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
270 ms
global.css
325 ms
post-29.css
326 ms
post-24.css
327 ms
post-105.css
373 ms
css
32 ms
fontawesome.min.css
388 ms
solid.min.css
385 ms
brands.min.css
396 ms
jquery.min.js
426 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
407 ms
core.min.js
440 ms
accordion.min.js
446 ms
datepicker.min.js
458 ms
ec-store.js
521 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
461 ms
primary-navigation.js
495 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
495 ms
widget-animated-headline.min.css
509 ms
widget-posts.min.css
511 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
526 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
553 ms
animations.min.css
551 ms
index.js
568 ms
index.js
562 ms
responsive-embeds.js
574 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
514 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
487 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
480 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
461 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
447 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
455 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
441 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
452 ms
hooks.min.js
432 ms
i18n.min.js
389 ms
frontend.min.js
397 ms
waypoints.min.js
393 ms
frontend.min.js
617 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
417 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
426 ms
polyfills.js
241 ms
6e2f3f5f1c72c9d62f435cdc572ac8d4
170 ms
nsf_logo-preview-q6e20yiencnjs9tejv5d4ayu4g7nd0xj9ryyg8tmo0.png
150 ms
nsf-banner-1.webp
260 ms
nsf-banner-2.jpg
253 ms
nsf-banner-3.webp
254 ms
DGT_Blog_-_Header_-_Oct_24.webp
516 ms
VISION.png
171 ms
MISSION.png
196 ms
news-image-1.jpg
207 ms
news1-1.jpg
255 ms
news2-1-1.jpg
267 ms
pattern.jpg
311 ms
bg-footer.jpg
423 ms
font
21 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
349 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
312 ms
font
31 ms
eicons.woff
323 ms
print.css
55 ms
nextstepfoundation.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
nextstepfoundation.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
nextstepfoundation.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nextstepfoundation.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nextstepfoundation.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nextstepfoundation.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NEXTSTEPFOUNDATION. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: