3.5 sec in total
87 ms
2.6 sec
849 ms
Visit photographytalk.com now to see the best up-to-date Photography Talk content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about photographytalk.com
Discover a thriving photography community PhotographyTalk where passionate photographers connect learn & grow. Access valuable resources & take your skills to next level.
Visit photographytalk.comWe analyzed Photographytalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 87 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
photographytalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value1,020 ms
26/100
30%
Value1.301
1/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
87 ms
906 ms
246 ms
25 ms
123 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Photographytalk.com, 37% (34 requests) were made to Static.photocdn.pt and 12% (11 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (906 ms) belongs to the original domain Photographytalk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (30%)
7.2 MB
5.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Photographytalk.com main page is 7.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 102.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Photography Talk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 937.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Photographytalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 937.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (73%)
74
20
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photography Talk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
photographytalk.com
87 ms
www.photographytalk.com
906 ms
home-newv2.css
246 ms
rokbox.css
25 ms
font-awesome.min.css
123 ms
module.css
111 ms
style.min.css
166 ms
css
215 ms
fonts.css
467 ms
animate.min.css
147 ms
magnific-popup.css
181 ms
override.css
156 ms
old.css
157 ms
style.css
245 ms
ent_menu.css
227 ms
jquery.min.js
305 ms
lazyload.js
242 ms
mootools-core.js
263 ms
core.js
240 ms
mootools-more.js
285 ms
rokbox.js
178 ms
bootstrap.min.js
274 ms
bootstrap-growl.min.js
268 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
151 ms
adsbygoogle.js
152 ms
loader.js
200 ms
bundle.js
198 ms
toolkit.min.js
200 ms
acl.js
199 ms
jquery.mobile-events.js
272 ms
ent_menu.js
285 ms
ajax_1.5.pack.js
197 ms
bootstrap.min.css
318 ms
theme.min.css
328 ms
custom-v5.css
304 ms
uikit.js
213 ms
autocomplete.js
209 ms
search.js
200 ms
tooltip.js
203 ms
social.js
198 ms
theme.js
306 ms
slogin.js
299 ms
slogin.css
201 ms
getTrackingCode
406 ms
6FA73EB470F387A98.css
48 ms
10014710-10014175.js
436 ms
analytics.js
57 ms
hotjar-79896.js
119 ms
modules-1f5c71aea63f8df71401422ed80fbe5f.js
27 ms
mixpanel-2-latest.min.js
38 ms
logo3.svg
38 ms
categories.jpg
196 ms
mobile-categories.jpg
85 ms
avatar-testimonial.png
66 ms
x-circle.png
63 ms
chck-mark-circle.png
61 ms
plans-tabletv2-compressor.png
84 ms
plan-tablev3-compressor.png
84 ms
pt-on-demand.png
200 ms
pt-on-demand-lg.png
202 ms
footer-logo.png
189 ms
footer-twitter.png
192 ms
footer-facebook.png
191 ms
footer-gplus.png
193 ms
bundle.js
247 ms
kb0zRBug==
24 ms
ved7jyfH3UvwChkhCjg==
23 ms
H0+GspfwEUj0HK
23 ms
gKiI0Gu
22 ms
F8KRfqAVwQnJGrhfpafiSeiYV1xd82ar8I4TwH3Hmc1OYO+UTyUsf1bBIc7HgmvZt7yBiqWsuD3TeeUl6oa2fikSB+SHvYyPr3keYmnh19L+RvTNEG6
21 ms
ved7jyfH3UvwChkhCjg==
22 ms
ARSPQco=
21 ms
L7trXS1rCY2Li6Sh6THvYxPL3le4snx11L+AqIjQa4=
22 ms
132 ms
top-bg-image-lgv2.jpg
158 ms
list-bullet.png
115 ms
radial-bg.png
118 ms
iphone-6.png
132 ms
ipad-air.png
158 ms
collect
70 ms
fbds.js
96 ms
collect
103 ms
LWUvwCRzEGq
8 ms
u3CA53PBJezbzlDVQsZcHvm84pL1U1svFJkd4nPexlfHzJ8xJPD7+W8hfz4kHC
7 ms
L7trXS1rCY2Li6Sh6THvYxPL3le4snx11L+ArJ6QbI=
9 ms
107 ms
spacer.gif
60 ms
plupload.min.js
5 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
54 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
74 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
84 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
101 ms
36 ms
photographytalk.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
photographytalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
photographytalk.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photographytalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Photographytalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
photographytalk.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Photography Talk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: