2.1 sec in total
273 ms
1.6 sec
208 ms
Visit pluscoding.com now to see the best up-to-date Pluscoding content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pluscoding.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit pluscoding.comWe analyzed Pluscoding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
pluscoding.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.0 s
0/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value8.5 s
18/100
10%
Value2,310 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.19
64/100
15%
Value19.5 s
2/100
10%
273 ms
217 ms
74 ms
54 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Pluscoding.com, 10% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (462 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 673.2 kB (66%)
1.0 MB
341.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Pluscoding.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 777.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pluscoding needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 504.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 504.0 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pluscoding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (73%)
98
26
The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pluscoding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pluscoding.com
273 ms
monetate.js
217 ms
application.css
74 ms
ng-modal.css
54 ms
angular.min.js
86 ms
ng-modal.js
50 ms
google_analytics.js
50 ms
google_oauth.js
50 ms
bold_chat.js
69 ms
eloqua.js
68 ms
hotjar.js
68 ms
adroll.js
67 ms
impactRadius.js
77 ms
in.js
99 ms
api.js
105 ms
api:client.js
103 ms
app.js
75 ms
cookies.js
74 ms
socialMedia.js
74 ms
countryDropdown.js
78 ms
monetate.js
77 ms
index.js
87 ms
lander.js
79 ms
seoPages.js
75 ms
sitePages.js
86 ms
search.js
86 ms
modal.js
84 ms
forms.js
84 ms
tldSelector.js
92 ms
setFixedTop.js
91 ms
searchBar.js
91 ms
currency.js
90 ms
trust.js
88 ms
conversion.js
66 ms
tdfs-inner.css
88 ms
tdfs-temp.css
95 ms
thankyou.css
89 ms
entry.js
7 ms
css
28 ms
fontawesome.min.css
14 ms
bd-icons.min.css
17 ms
ga.js
54 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
54 ms
userspace
197 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
43 ms
recaptcha__en.js
358 ms
all.js
458 ms
355 ms
logo-header-2x.png
149 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
254 ms
295 ms
hotjar-10205.js
209 ms
elqCfg.min.js
98 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
78 ms
bg-select.png
186 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
188 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
106 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
105 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
109 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
107 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
106 ms
__utm.gif
77 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
57 ms
postmessageRelay
181 ms
framework
109 ms
svrGP
196 ms
svrGP
174 ms
__utm.gif
81 ms
__utm.gif
104 ms
167 ms
collect
233 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
179 ms
fallback
137 ms
iframe
90 ms
183 ms
svrGP.aspx
43 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
76 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
42 ms
xd_arbiter.php
234 ms
xd_arbiter.php
462 ms
svrGP.aspx
60 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
66 ms
fallback__ltr.css
29 ms
payload
32 ms
css
70 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
13 ms
iframerpc
87 ms
logo_48.png
6 ms
refresh.png
4 ms
audio.png
4 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
28 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
30 ms
vms.js
148 ms
roundtrip.js
14 ms
xd_arbiter.php
142 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
29 ms
visit-data
211 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
76 ms
out
9 ms
58 ms
36 ms
46 ms
out
39 ms
out
38 ms
out
45 ms
out
45 ms
out
45 ms
out
46 ms
out
53 ms
out
49 ms
66 ms
u.php
115 ms
sync
39 ms
adsct
112 ms
pixel
75 ms
49 ms
bc.pv
84 ms
44 ms
sd
23 ms
tap.php
26 ms
377928.gif
10 ms
in
6 ms
pluscoding.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
pluscoding.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
pluscoding.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pluscoding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pluscoding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pluscoding.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pluscoding. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: