1.3 sec in total
Click here to check amazing Polygon content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about polygon.net
Polygon is the most active trading network for jewelry professionals. We provide wholesale jewelry, wholesale diamonds, gems and watches to qualified retail jewelers. As a Polygon member, you will get...Visit polygon.net
We analyzed Polygon.net page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
polygon.net performance score
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Polygon.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (291 ms) belongs to the original domain Polygon.net.
Page size can be reduced by 441.6 kB (43%)
Potential reduce by 23.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Polygon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 372.4 kB
Potential reduce by 36.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polygon.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (44%)
polygon.net accessibility score
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
polygon.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
polygon.net SEO score
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polygon.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Polygon.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polygon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: