Tools & Wizards About Us
protoolinnovationawards.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

protoolinnovationawards.com

Pro Tool Innovation Awards | Industry Recognition for Great Tools

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

200 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

404 ms

protoolinnovationawards.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pro Tool Innovation Awards content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about protoolinnovationawards.com

The Pro Tool Innovation Awards are judged by a panel of industry professionals who use 100s of new tools on the jobsite throughout the year.

Visit protoolinnovationawards.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Protoolinnovationawards.com page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

protoolinnovationawards.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value12,310 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

protoolinnovationawards.com

200 ms

protoolinnovationawards.com

286 ms

autoptimize_d4065a9f58eaecad4a098a998a38b489.css

33 ms

autoptimize_29b0f548a4864b537ab78c18ea45cd1a.css

88 ms

autoptimize_single_90a0f8e8334f8d84671041f053511f64.css

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Protoolinnovationawards.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (347 ms) belongs to the original domain Protoolinnovationawards.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 161.4 kB (42%)

Content Size

387.4 kB

After Optimization

226.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Protoolinnovationawards.com main page is 387.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 135.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 79.5 kB

  • Original 96.4 kB
  • After minification 96.1 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 135.3 kB
  • After minification 135.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pro Tool Innovation Awards images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 87 B

  • Original 56.3 kB
  • After minification 56.3 kB
  • After compression 56.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 81.8 kB

  • Original 99.5 kB
  • After minification 18.4 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protoolinnovationawards.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 81.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (74%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pro Tool Innovation Awards. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

protoolinnovationawards.com

protoolinnovationawards.com

200 ms

protoolinnovationawards.com

protoolinnovationawards.com

286 ms

autoptimize_d4065a9f58eaecad4a098a998a38b489.css

autoptimize_d4065a9f58eaecad4a098a998a38b489.css

33 ms

autoptimize_29b0f548a4864b537ab78c18ea45cd1a.css

autoptimize_29b0f548a4864b537ab78c18ea45cd1a.css

88 ms

autoptimize_single_90a0f8e8334f8d84671041f053511f64.css

autoptimize_single_90a0f8e8334f8d84671041f053511f64.css

85 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

105 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

109 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

102 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

109 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

124 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

122 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

126 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

126 ms

js

js

189 ms

autoptimize_c7e8c45396c75e748530af4287dcf7e2.js

autoptimize_c7e8c45396c75e748530af4287dcf7e2.js

158 ms

css

css

142 ms

background-image2-300x188.jpg

background-image2-300x188.jpg

86 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

286 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

145 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

146 ms

background-image-1.jpg

background-image-1.jpg

347 ms

js

js

167 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

162 ms

2020-PTIA-site-300x99.png

2020-PTIA-site-300x99.png

73 ms

Accessibility Review

protoolinnovationawards.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

protoolinnovationawards.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

protoolinnovationawards.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protoolinnovationawards.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Protoolinnovationawards.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

protoolinnovationawards.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pro Tool Innovation Awards. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: