6.4 sec in total
779 ms
5.2 sec
472 ms
Click here to check amazing Qrator content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about qrator.net
Qrator Labs - DDoS attacks protection, WAF, DNS, Internet Service Providers, Hosting Service Providers and Data Centers protection, CDN, Bot protection | Best Website Security
Visit qrator.netWe analyzed Qrator.net page load time and found that the first response time was 779 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
qrator.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value960 ms
29/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
779 ms
191 ms
283 ms
191 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Qrator.net, 8% (4 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Qrator.net.
Page size can be reduced by 295.8 kB (61%)
484.1 kB
188.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Qrator.net main page is 484.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 148.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Qrator needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 75.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 75.0 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qrator.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (43%)
37
21
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qrator. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
779 ms
fonts.css
191 ms
style.min.css
283 ms
jqvmap.min.css
191 ms
qrtr_logo.png
192 ms
proximanova-light-webfont.woff
190 ms
proximanova-reg-webfont.woff
802 ms
websymbolsligaregular.woff
380 ms
helv-6-medium-webfont.woff
750 ms
common.min.js
1883 ms
index.min.js
96 ms
jquery.vmap.world.en.min.js
1297 ms
iso-converter.en.min.js
111 ms
video_slug.jpg
1796 ms
video.png
206 ms
1.png
301 ms
2.png
411 ms
3.png
872 ms
4.png
490 ms
5.png
1055 ms
6.png
585 ms
promo.png
681 ms
e-commerce.png
775 ms
finance.png
1301 ms
media.png
966 ms
enterprise.png
1061 ms
https.png
1149 ms
adaptive.png
1155 ms
persistent.png
1242 ms
balancing.png
1250 ms
qdns.png
1337 ms
api.png
1345 ms
waf.png
1388 ms
httpse.png
1393 ms
vpn.png
1431 ms
failover.png
1438 ms
helv-5-normal-webfont.woff
2718 ms
helv-4-light-webfont.woff
1754 ms
segoeuil-webfont.woff
2717 ms
segoeui-webfont.woff
3206 ms
segoeuisl-webfont.woff
3152 ms
seguisb-webfont.woff
3935 ms
segoeuib-webfont.woff
3526 ms
proximanova-xbold-webfont.woff
4187 ms
helv-7-bold-webfont.woff
3504 ms
shim.css
1377 ms
watch.js
168 ms
analytics.js
58 ms
collect
27 ms
watch.js
467 ms
advert.gif
90 ms
1
92 ms
qrator.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
qrator.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
qrator.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qrator.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Qrator.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qrator.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qrator. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: