7.7 sec in total
1.5 sec
6.2 sec
6 ms
Welcome to redutex.com homepage info - get ready to check Redutex best content right away, or after learning these important things about redutex.com
Exclusive and original 3D self-adhesive textures: roofs, ridge, tiles, walls, bricks, pavements, driveways, floors and much more!
Visit redutex.comWe analyzed Redutex.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
redutex.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value39.4 s
0/100
25%
Value21.3 s
0/100
10%
Value15,440 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value48.2 s
0/100
10%
1548 ms
630 ms
348 ms
822 ms
425 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Redutex.com, 19% (13 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 12% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Redutex.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (32%)
4.4 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Redutex.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 445.0 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 96% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Redutex images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 38.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 23.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Redutex.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (43%)
58
33
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Redutex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1548 ms
theme-4e0b62401.css
630 ms
font-awesome-preload.css
348 ms
bottom-0e2238400.js
822 ms
analytics.js
425 ms
P9PO_yeE3Dw
559 ms
aMwjpvaD1Ms
647 ms
embed
551 ms
redutex-logo-1635528401.jpg
360 ms
IMG_20220512_112502.jpg
640 ms
IMG_20220512_112610.jpg
625 ms
police_ventana4.jpg
1078 ms
18-thumb.jpg
1097 ms
17-thumb.jpg
1255 ms
16-thumb.jpg
1097 ms
15-thumb.jpg
1079 ms
14-thumb.jpg
1078 ms
12-thumb.jpg
1096 ms
13-thumb.jpg
1253 ms
10-thumb.jpg
1253 ms
pago-seguro-garantizado.png
1252 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1262 ms
ec.js
42 ms
collect
33 ms
wood-3253358_1920.jpg
1681 ms
css
40 ms
www-player.css
112 ms
www-embed-player.js
158 ms
base.js
196 ms
rs=ABjfnFV0pirKJ59Bzx_oqPwJorCo1yxeLA
547 ms
css
136 ms
js
543 ms
m=gmeviewer_base
561 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
108 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
109 ms
jz7nBWcXoC6PzFPxSGBK-EbGk4-kUqTnoXZXIXcr3eQ.js
50 ms
embed.js
68 ms
gen_204
116 ms
lazy.min.js
67 ms
m=ws9Tlc
46 ms
common.js
229 ms
util.js
531 ms
map.js
522 ms
overlay.js
540 ms
1899-blank-shape_pin_4x.png&highlight=ff000000,01579B&scale=2.0
630 ms
marker.js
624 ms
geocoder.js
614 ms
controls.js
578 ms
places_impl.js
613 ms
1899-blank-shape_pin_4x.png&highlight=ff000000,E65100&scale=2.0
808 ms
1899-blank-shape_pin_4x.png&highlight=ff000000,097138&scale=2.0
812 ms
1899-blank-shape_pin_4x.png&highlight=ff000000,0097A7&scale=2.0
951 ms
selection_2x-000.png
500 ms
Create
617 ms
Create
809 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
496 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
691 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
691 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
525 ms
gen204
420 ms
info-000.png
414 ms
gm-close000.png
423 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
534 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
534 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
415 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
227 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
224 ms
onion.js
221 ms
redutex.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
redutex.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
redutex.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Redutex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Redutex.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
redutex.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Redutex. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: