10.9 sec in total
1 sec
8.9 sec
1 sec
Visit reliancepacker.com now to see the best up-to-date Reliancepacker content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reliancepacker.com
Experience a seamless relocation with the leading Packers and Movers in Delhi. Contact us today for your moving and relocation needs in Delhi NCR.
Visit reliancepacker.comWe analyzed Reliancepacker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 9.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
reliancepacker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.8 s
0/100
10%
Value17.0 s
0/100
25%
Value22.8 s
0/100
10%
Value1,800 ms
9/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.9 s
4/100
10%
1019 ms
20 ms
14 ms
21 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Reliancepacker.com, 32% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Reliancepacker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 192.9 kB (56%)
347.0 kB
154.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Reliancepacker.com main page is 347.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 231.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 192.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 192.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 897 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reliancepacker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reliancepacker.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (84%)
49
8
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reliancepacker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.reliancepacker.com
1019 ms
main.min.css
20 ms
chaty-front.min.css
14 ms
styles.css
21 ms
contact-form-7-main.min.css
26 ms
frontend.min.css
23 ms
swiper.min.css
35 ms
e-swiper.min.css
25 ms
post-10035.css
28 ms
frontend.min.css
41 ms
slideInLeft.min.css
35 ms
widget-image.min.css
32 ms
fadeIn.min.css
34 ms
widget-heading.min.css
39 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
51 ms
e-animation-float.min.css
52 ms
fadeInUp.min.css
52 ms
widget-divider.min.css
51 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
53 ms
slideInRight.min.css
53 ms
widget-image-box.min.css
55 ms
widget-star-rating.min.css
55 ms
widget-counter.min.css
56 ms
widget-toggle.min.css
57 ms
e-animation-pulse.min.css
58 ms
post-6528.css
59 ms
css
51 ms
jquery.min.js
58 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
55 ms
email-decode.min.js
55 ms
hooks.min.js
128 ms
i18n.min.js
130 ms
api.js
49 ms
index.js
130 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
132 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
128 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
132 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
132 ms
frontend.min.js
133 ms
core.min.js
135 ms
frontend.min.js
126 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
150 ms
lazyload.min.js
145 ms
gtm.js
153 ms
hector-martinez-110928-unsplash.jpg
61 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
66 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
80 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
81 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
81 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
80 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
81 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjg.woff
81 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjg.woff
82 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZ9hjg.woff
83 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfAZ9hjg.woff
82 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeAZ9hjg.woff
82 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjg.woff
82 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjg.woff
86 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYAZ9hjg.woff
83 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYAZ9hjg.woff
85 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
58 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
58 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
58 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
59 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
114 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
115 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
116 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
115 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
116 ms
rpmcolor.png
29 ms
hero-pic-wide-1024x876.jpg
84 ms
why-choose-us-img-1024x690.jpg
1602 ms
Testimonials-pic1.jpg
831 ms
Testimonials-pic2.jpg
817 ms
reliancepacker.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
reliancepacker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
reliancepacker.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reliancepacker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reliancepacker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reliancepacker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reliancepacker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: