Tools & Wizards About Us
rficonsultants.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    69% of websites

rficonsultants.net

RFI Consultants | NACE Certified Coating Inspectors | Phoenix AZ

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

962 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

rficonsultants.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rficonsultants.net homepage info - get ready to check RFI Consultants best content right away, or after learning these important things about rficonsultants.net

RFI Consultants exists to provide inspection services to minimize the risk of premature or catastrophic coating failures.

Visit rficonsultants.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rficonsultants.net page load time and found that the first response time was 962 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rficonsultants.net performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,320 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.129

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rficonsultants.net

962 ms

styles.css

61 ms

style.css

41 ms

js

209 ms

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Rficonsultants.net, 46% (28 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (962 ms) belongs to the original domain Rficonsultants.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 361.3 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rficonsultants.net main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 135.4 kB

  • Original 162.0 kB
  • After minification 159.8 kB
  • After compression 26.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 135.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 60.8 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RFI Consultants images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 74.8 kB

  • Original 137.1 kB
  • After minification 135.7 kB
  • After compression 62.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 74.8 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 90.3 kB

  • Original 107.5 kB
  • After minification 106.2 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rficonsultants.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 90.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (71%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RFI Consultants. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rficonsultants.net

rficonsultants.net

962 ms

styles.css

styles.css

61 ms

style.css

style.css

41 ms

js

js

209 ms

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

69 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

93 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

80 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

185 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

189 ms

index.js

index.js

213 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

422 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

211 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

467 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

210 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

218 ms

common.js

common.js

419 ms

api.js

api.js

451 ms

index.js

index.js

419 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

441 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

451 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

450 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

449 ms

bg2.jpg

bg2.jpg

314 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

441 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

549 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff

561 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

556 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff

560 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

555 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff

538 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

878 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff

878 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

878 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

622 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4rQwOwpmPQ.woff

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4rQwOwpmPQ.woff

610 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4rQwOwpmPg.ttf

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4rQwOwpmPg.ttf

609 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4tMwOwpmPQ.woff

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4tMwOwpmPQ.woff

608 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4tMwOwpmPg.ttf

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4tMwOwpmPg.ttf

619 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4vowOwpmPQ.woff

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4vowOwpmPQ.woff

619 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4vowOwpmPg.ttf

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4vowOwpmPg.ttf

619 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4o0wOwpmPQ.woff

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4o0wOwpmPQ.woff

729 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4o0wOwpmPg.ttf

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4o0wOwpmPg.ttf

619 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4mE3OwpmPQ.woff

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4mE3OwpmPQ.woff

632 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4mE3OwpmPg.ttf

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4mE3OwpmPg.ttf

654 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4lM3OwpmPQ.woff

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4lM3OwpmPQ.woff

652 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4lM3OwpmPg.ttf

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4lM3OwpmPg.ttf

653 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4g03OwpmPQ.woff

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4g03OwpmPQ.woff

652 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4g03OwpmPg.ttf

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4g03OwpmPg.ttf

651 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4tM3OwpmPQ.woff

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4tM3OwpmPQ.woff

829 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4tM3OwpmPg.ttf

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4tM3OwpmPg.ttf

740 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4lM2OwpmPQ.woff

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4lM2OwpmPQ.woff

752 ms

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4lM2OwpmPg.ttf

4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4lM2OwpmPg.ttf

739 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

284 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

634 ms

company-logo.png

company-logo.png

487 ms

wrf-1.jpg

wrf-1.jpg

370 ms

wrf-10.jpg

wrf-10.jpg

478 ms

wrf-9.jpg

wrf-9.jpg

476 ms

wrf-8.jpg

wrf-8.jpg

475 ms

wrf-6.jpg

wrf-6.jpg

360 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

59 ms

Accessibility Review

rficonsultants.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rficonsultants.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rficonsultants.net SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rficonsultants.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rficonsultants.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rficonsultants.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RFI Consultants. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: