7.8 sec in total
1.6 sec
4.6 sec
1.7 sec
Visit ribitus.com now to see the best up-to-date Ribitus content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ribitus.com
Visit ribitus.comWe analyzed Ribitus.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ribitus.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value6.3 s
41/100
10%
Value1,940 ms
8/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
1559 ms
137 ms
139 ms
144 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Ribitus.com, 17% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ribitus.com.
Page size can be reduced by 683.2 kB (52%)
1.3 MB
619.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ribitus.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 443.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ribitus images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 298.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.6 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 313.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ribitus.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 313.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (58%)
43
18
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ribitus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ribitus.com
1559 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
137 ms
frontend.css
139 ms
theme-my-login.css
144 ms
css
26 ms
genericons.css
211 ms
style.css
212 ms
jquery.js
298 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
223 ms
paid-memberships-pro.js
229 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
175 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
245 ms
functions.js
348 ms
wp-embed.min.js
239 ms
player.min.js
347 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
353 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
353 ms
CloakerFull.jpg
719 ms
GwRo8fQtqpE
712 ms
ribitus-logo-sma.png
698 ms
bgr-menu-separator.png
693 ms
psf-scepter.jpg
698 ms
Guest_Post.png
694 ms
Einstein-funny.png
703 ms
ioncow.png
701 ms
xingla4-cover_sm.jpg
698 ms
tooltipdescription.jpg
698 ms
xinglapro-full.jpg
700 ms
amazingcloaker7-box_sm.jpg
699 ms
yellowbrickroad1.jpg
698 ms
simple-smile.png
701 ms
spock-ow.jpg
700 ms
inner-circle1.jpg
702 ms
footer-bullit.png
702 ms
facebook_s.png
740 ms
linkedin_s.png
739 ms
twitter_s.png
739 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
630 ms
BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf
631 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
632 ms
5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf
633 ms
VqvVqv1mv0Gr1Gr9Frul7xuyp+V8XvqnTyb1UoNRm4Af+FsAGNAEuwCFBYsQEBjlmxRgYrWCGwEFlLsBRSWCGwgFkdsAYrXFhZsBQrAAAAAVLP0T8AAA==
603 ms
LgcV55siz7BRNdbO3Huj5g.ttf
630 ms
XNVd6tsqi9wmKNvnh5HNEKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
631 ms
AcvTq8Q0lyKKNxRlL28Rn6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
631 ms
1f61b.png
499 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
54 ms
www-embed-player.js
77 ms
base.js
98 ms
print.css
128 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
29 ms
ad_status.js
30 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
29 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
32 ms
ribitus.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ribitus.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
ribitus.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ribitus.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ribitus.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ribitus.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ribitus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: