Tools & Wizards About Us
riglogistics.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

riglogistics.com

RIG Logistics | Asset-based CAN, USA, MEX Shipping

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

809 ms

riglogistics.com screenshot

About Website

Visit riglogistics.com now to see the best up-to-date RIG Logistics content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about riglogistics.com

Supply chain experts delivering world-class LTL & TL, LCV & dedicated transport and warehousing solutions for your general & temp-sensitive freight.

Visit riglogistics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Riglogistics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riglogistics.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.327

35/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riglogistics.com

179 ms

style.min.css

281 ms

style.min.css

276 ms

style.min.css

275 ms

style.min.css

286 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Riglogistics.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (753 ms) belongs to the original domain Riglogistics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.5 kB (3%)

Content Size

9.4 MB

After Optimization

9.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Riglogistics.com main page is 9.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 149.1 kB

  • Original 181.1 kB
  • After minification 179.1 kB
  • After compression 32.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 68.6 kB

  • Original 8.5 MB
  • After minification 8.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RIG Logistics images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 528.5 kB
  • After minification 528.5 kB
  • After compression 525.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 26.2 kB

  • Original 219.7 kB
  • After minification 212.4 kB
  • After compression 193.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riglogistics.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (67%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RIG Logistics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

riglogistics.com

riglogistics.com

179 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

281 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

276 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

275 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

286 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

285 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

292 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

347 ms

styles.css

styles.css

340 ms

css

css

92 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

363 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

367 ms

simple-job-board-public.css

simple-job-board-public.css

368 ms

be.css

be.css

473 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

407 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

414 ms

jplayer.blue.monday.min.css

jplayer.blue.monday.min.css

433 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

429 ms

css

css

97 ms

pum-site-styles.css

pum-site-styles.css

99 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

83 ms

style.css

style.css

418 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

510 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

523 ms

js

js

128 ms

css

css

80 ms

post-15.css

post-15.css

532 ms

post-49.css

post-49.css

533 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

533 ms

index.js

index.js

568 ms

index.js

index.js

569 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

667 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

668 ms

main.js

main.js

570 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

570 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

667 ms

debouncedresize.min.js

debouncedresize.min.js

667 ms

magnificpopup.min.js

magnificpopup.min.js

666 ms

menu.js

menu.js

667 ms

visible.min.js

visible.min.js

753 ms

api.js

api.js

108 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

751 ms

css

css

20 ms

jplayer.min.js

jplayer.min.js

666 ms

enllax.min.js

enllax.min.js

494 ms

translate3d.js

translate3d.js

491 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

486 ms

pum-site-scripts.js

pum-site-scripts.js

74 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

531 ms

index.js

index.js

533 ms

css2

css2

18 ms

logo.png

logo.png

283 ms

slide3.png

slide3.png

673 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

138 ms

arrow-down.png

arrow-down.png

281 ms

temperature-controlled.png

temperature-controlled.png

282 ms

truckload.png

truckload.png

372 ms

lcv.png

lcv.png

371 ms

lcv-mobile.png

lcv-mobile.png

369 ms

dedicated.png

dedicated.png

371 ms

truckload-mobile.png

truckload-mobile.png

370 ms

warehousing.png

warehousing.png

392 ms

expedited.png

expedited.png

395 ms

3flag.png

3flag.png

408 ms

line2.png

line2.png

408 ms

line1.png

line1.png

434 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

457 ms

affiliation.png

affiliation.png

463 ms

affiliation-mobile.png

affiliation-mobile.png

435 ms

font

font

98 ms

font

font

97 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

341 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

434 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

392 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

403 ms

icons.woff

icons.woff

466 ms

proudly-serving.png

proudly-serving.png

496 ms

family.png

family.png

548 ms

bg-footer-1.jpg

bg-footer-1.jpg

440 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

46 ms

Accessibility Review

riglogistics.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

riglogistics.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

riglogistics.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riglogistics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riglogistics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

riglogistics.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RIG Logistics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: