Tools & Wizards About Us
ringoblog.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

ringoblog.com

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

219 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

506 ms

ringoblog.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ringoblog.com homepage info - get ready to check Ringoblog best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ringoblog.com

RingOBlog - Directory of Wonderful Rings - The Ring Blog

Visit ringoblog.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ringoblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 219 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ringoblog.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,930 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ringoblog.com

219 ms

style.css

133 ms

rssstyle.css

468 ms

tw-sack.min.js

138 ms

email-js-packed.js

140 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Ringoblog.com, 10% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 8% (8 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (881 ms) belongs to the original domain Ringoblog.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 466.1 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

868.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ringoblog.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 676.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 76.0 kB

  • Original 93.5 kB
  • After minification 86.7 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 22.3 kB

  • Original 676.9 kB
  • After minification 654.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ringoblog images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 343.9 kB

  • Original 534.3 kB
  • After minification 529.5 kB
  • After compression 190.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 343.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 23.8 kB

  • Original 29.3 kB
  • After minification 21.1 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ringoblog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (51%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

47

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ringoblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ringoblog.com

ringoblog.com

219 ms

style.css

style.css

133 ms

rssstyle.css

rssstyle.css

468 ms

tw-sack.min.js

tw-sack.min.js

138 ms

email-js-packed.js

email-js-packed.js

140 ms

email-css.css

email-css.css

140 ms

wp-page-numbers.css

wp-page-numbers.css

140 ms

wpsf-js.php

wpsf-js.php

409 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

83 ms

amazon.js

amazon.js

205 ms

jsapi

jsapi

32 ms

google_service.js

google_service.js

32 ms

1291366189.js

1291366189.js

100 ms

pinit.js

pinit.js

7 ms

infolinks_main.js

infolinks_main.js

57 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

145 ms

counter_xhtml.js

counter_xhtml.js

5 ms

886X215556.skimlinks.js

886X215556.skimlinks.js

229 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

103 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

13 ms

18 ms

google_ads.js

google_ads.js

16 ms

Ring-o-blog

Ring-o-blog

49 ms

add.gif

add.gif

35 ms

addtomyyahoo4.gif

addtomyyahoo4.gif

33 ms

myAOLButtonSmall.gif

myAOLButtonSmall.gif

33 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

71 ms

logobottom.gif

logobottom.gif

74 ms

twitter.gif

twitter.gif

75 ms

facebook.gif

facebook.gif

74 ms

search.gif

search.gif

72 ms

bkg.gif

bkg.gif

71 ms

bkg_active.gif

bkg_active.gif

403 ms

rings-that-go-on-the-top-of-your-finger.jpg

rings-that-go-on-the-top-of-your-finger.jpg

524 ms

midi-rings.jpg

midi-rings.jpg

434 ms

rose-pink-gold-engagement-rings.jpg

rose-pink-gold-engagement-rings.jpg

403 ms

cinderella-wedding-ring-set.jpg

cinderella-wedding-ring-set.jpg

521 ms

black-pearl-ring.jpg

black-pearl-ring.jpg

434 ms

nola-singer-768x1024.jpg

nola-singer-768x1024.jpg

598 ms

double-finger-rings.jpg

double-finger-rings.jpg

433 ms

valentines-day-rings.jpg

valentines-day-rings.jpg

561 ms

tiger-rings.jpg

tiger-rings.jpg

881 ms

weird-rings.jpg

weird-rings.jpg

523 ms

reader.aol.com

reader.aol.com

91 ms

ads

ads

50 ms

image-3193014-10599724

image-3193014-10599724

11 ms

user_sync.html

user_sync.html

14 ms

usersyncup-an.html

usersyncup-an.html

296 ms

ice.js

ice.js

365 ms

ip.php

ip.php

455 ms

likebox.php

likebox.php

458 ms

10599724-1448049688829

10599724-1448049688829

39 ms

osd.js

osd.js

12 ms

t.php

t.php

317 ms

showad.js

showad.js

27 ms

t.php

t.php

313 ms

pinit_main.js

pinit_main.js

280 ms

272 ms

PugMaster

PugMaster

259 ms

quant.js

quant.js

255 ms

pm_match

pm_match

35 ms

pixel

pixel

32 ms

Pug

Pug

38 ms

usersync.aspx

usersync.aspx

37 ms

pixel;r=1553914528;a=p-450xC7Fj7uzPE;fpan=1;fpa=P0-316510469-1458134390082;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458134390081;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fringoblog.com%2F;ogl=

pixel;r=1553914528;a=p-450xC7Fj7uzPE;fpan=1;fpa=P0-316510469-1458134390082;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458134390081;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fringoblog.com%2F;ogl=

17 ms

Pug

Pug

21 ms

Pug

Pug

20 ms

Pug

Pug

25 ms

Pug

Pug

18 ms

Pug

Pug

15 ms

14581343901751

14581343901751

46 ms

UThj8VI7Xhd.css

UThj8VI7Xhd.css

53 ms

vGEj5aAS1BY.css

vGEj5aAS1BY.css

63 ms

FAHeNGXgPup.js

FAHeNGXgPup.js

71 ms

FJmpeSpHpjS.js

FJmpeSpHpjS.js

69 ms

0wM5s1Khldu.js

0wM5s1Khldu.js

69 ms

1bNoFZUdlYZ.js

1bNoFZUdlYZ.js

70 ms

Pug

Pug

49 ms

FBLIS.html

FBLIS.html

133 ms

doq.htm

doq.htm

159 ms

mapuid

mapuid

16 ms

19966_326996074382_3052796_n.jpg

19966_326996074382_3052796_n.jpg

47 ms

12342313_1659534730990642_6220904482767742988_n.jpg

12342313_1659534730990642_6220904482767742988_n.jpg

21 ms

65771_175111745846476_4756717_n.jpg

65771_175111745846476_4756717_n.jpg

22 ms

12745889_10206536596077092_2300495975650734695_n.jpg

12745889_10206536596077092_2300495975650734695_n.jpg

24 ms

943717_546893282037026_1114502957_n.jpg

943717_546893282037026_1114502957_n.jpg

19 ms

12541010_897947633656816_5595095725976618046_n.jpg

12541010_897947633656816_5595095725976618046_n.jpg

24 ms

417897_455293841214650_1278126825_n.jpg

417897_455293841214650_1278126825_n.jpg

21 ms

11140302_1379403592389706_3767158878784785012_n.jpg

11140302_1379403592389706_3767158878784785012_n.jpg

24 ms

wL6VQj7Ab77.png

wL6VQj7Ab77.png

18 ms

s7jcwEQH7Sx.png

s7jcwEQH7Sx.png

16 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

18 ms

I6-MnjEovm5.js

I6-MnjEovm5.js

22 ms

pQrUxxo5oQp.js

pQrUxxo5oQp.js

23 ms

139 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

127 ms

loader-bg.png

loader-bg.png

65 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

44 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

67 ms

link

link

27 ms

track.php

track.php

39 ms

p.skimresources.com

p.skimresources.com

45 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

7 ms

Accessibility Review

ringoblog.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ringoblog.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ringoblog.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ringoblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ringoblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ringoblog.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ringoblog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: