6.8 sec in total
460 ms
2.5 sec
3.9 sec
Click here to check amazing Robotic Pool Cleaners Compared content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com
Looking for the best robotic pool cleaner? One of these 14 pool robots from Dophin, Hayward & Polaris will def. meet your needs.
Visit roboticpoolcleanerscompared.comWe analyzed Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com page load time and found that the first response time was 460 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value27.8 s
0/100
25%
Value20.3 s
0/100
10%
Value32,210 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.188
65/100
15%
Value43.0 s
0/100
10%
460 ms
107 ms
209 ms
104 ms
103 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com, 10% (9 requests) were made to M.media-amazon.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Z-na.amazon-adsystem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (993 ms) belongs to the original domain Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com.
Page size can be reduced by 139.7 kB (10%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 136.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 662 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Robotic Pool Cleaners Compared images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 550 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (41%)
87
51
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Robotic Pool Cleaners Compared. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com
460 ms
style.css
107 ms
style.min.css
209 ms
aalb_basics.css
104 ms
form_style.css
103 ms
rounded-thumbs.min.css
102 ms
go_pricing_styles.css
214 ms
screen.min.css
213 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
220 ms
tablepress-responsive.min.css
204 ms
onejs
363 ms
onejs
270 ms
snippet.affilimate.io
359 ms
onejs
267 ms
1.2.2
274 ms
comment-reply.min.js
186 ms
go_pricing_scripts.js
698 ms
front.min.js
259 ms
frontend.min.js
255 ms
jquery.datatables.min.js
699 ms
js
345 ms
adsbygoogle.js
351 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
247 ms
v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194
347 ms
style_reset.css
167 ms
flexslider.css
178 ms
elastislide.css
176 ms
style_main.css
188 ms
style_667.css
183 ms
style_480.css
237 ms
style_414.css
255 ms
style_375.css
256 ms
style_320.css
266 ms
style_768.css
259 ms
style_1024.css
262 ms
tabber.css
270 ms
wpp.css
267 ms
41wijSHOOxL._SL160_.jpg
489 ms
41k3iH3UqkL._SL160_.jpg
483 ms
511XOT9QAZL._AC_SL300_.jpg
481 ms
510VIiB1mIL._AC_SL300_.jpg
482 ms
41HH%2BgRFLKL._AC_SL300_.jpg
481 ms
81YDLHwZFiL._AC_SL300_.jpg
486 ms
51P4ZB3QgVL._AC_SL300_.jpg
494 ms
71kGXQspUvL._AC_SL300_.jpg
484 ms
51K+7SV+5lL.jpg
475 ms
deep-blue-pool.jpeg
496 ms
robotic_pool_cleaners_compared_logo_300x100.png
445 ms
search-arrow.png
442 ms
preloader-dark.gif
445 ms
Polaris-P955-remote.jpeg
444 ms
Hayward-SharkVac-XL-500x350.jpg
436 ms
Dolphin-Triton-Robotic-Pool-Cleaner-500x350.jpg
561 ms
Maytronics-DX3-Robotic-Pool-Cleaner-620x350.jpg
576 ms
Polaris-9450-Robotic-Pool-Cleaner-476x350.jpg
473 ms
Pool-Rover-T-Junior-Automatic-Pool-Cleaner-620x350.jpg
627 ms
see-it-on-Amazon-e1464201433963.png
591 ms
Hayward-2025ADC-PoolVac.jpg
574 ms
DOLPHIN-Triton-PS.jpg
627 ms
DOLPHIN-Nautilus-CC.jpg
671 ms
Polaris-9450-Sport-Robotic-Pool-Cleaner.jpg
714 ms
DOLPHIN-Premier-Robotic-Pool-Cleaner.jpg
770 ms
Instapark-Betta-Automatic-Robotic-Pool-Cleaner.jpg
701 ms
Hayward-W3RC9740CUB-SharkVac.jpg
683 ms
Hayward-W32025ADC-PoolVac-XL-Suction-Pool-Cleaner.jpg
689 ms
Hayward-W3500-Aquabug-Above-Ground.jpg
768 ms
Polaris-F9550-Sport-Robotic-In-Ground-Pool-Cleaner-300x171.jpg
755 ms
Buy-on-amazon.png
830 ms
Dolphin-Nautilus-CC-Automatic-Robotic-Pool-Cleaner.jpg
828 ms
Dolphin-Nautilus-CC-Plus-Automatic-Robotic-Pool-Cleaner.jpg
838 ms
Dolphin-Premier-300x287.jpg
835 ms
Dolphin-Quantum-300x300.jpg
893 ms
Dolphin-Triton-PS-Automatic-Robotic-Pool-Cleaner.jpg
924 ms
DOLPHIN-Triton-PS-Plus-Robotic-Pool-Cleaner.jpg
963 ms
PAXCESS-Cordless-Automatic-Pool-Cleaner.jpg
934 ms
4-and-a-half-stars.png
843 ms
tangledhose-300x168.jpg
974 ms
cleaners_maytronics_dx3-259x300.jpeg
977 ms
Hayward-900-Wanda-the-Whale-Suction-Above-Ground-Pool-Cleaner-50x50.jpg
993 ms
battery-operated-pool-vacuum-reviews-50x50.jpg
844 ms
PoolMaster-Test-Kit-50x50.jpg
954 ms
man-cleans-a-wall-50x50.jpg
886 ms
Taylor-Service-Complete-Pool-Water-Test-Kit-K-2006C-50x50.jpg
602 ms
robotic_pool_cleaners_compared_logo_forblackbackground_150x50.png
614 ms
small-social-sprite.png
616 ms
top-arrow.png
624 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
91 ms
jquery.min.js
158 ms
roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Robotic Pool Cleaners Compared. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: