2.9 sec in total
749 ms
2 sec
131 ms
Visit editor.sitebuilder.com now to see the best up-to-date Editor Sitebuilder content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about editor.sitebuilder.com
Visit editor.sitebuilder.comWe analyzed Editor.sitebuilder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 749 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
editor.sitebuilder.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value2.6 s
98/100
10%
749 ms
151 ms
238 ms
269 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Editor.sitebuilder.com, 32% (10 requests) were made to Storage.googleapis.com and 16% (5 requests) were made to Webzaitest.blob.core.windows.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (749 ms) belongs to the original domain Editor.sitebuilder.com.
Page size can be reduced by 4.8 MB (77%)
6.3 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Editor.sitebuilder.com main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 5.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Editor Sitebuilder needs image optimization as it can save up to 58.3 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 4.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.0 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 777.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Editor.sitebuilder.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 777.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (57%)
21
9
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Editor Sitebuilder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
editor.sitebuilder.com
749 ms
designer-init.css
151 ms
designer-1.css
238 ms
designer-2.css
269 ms
css
32 ms
css
44 ms
css
53 ms
designer-init.js
185 ms
ckeditor.js
196 ms
designer-lang-en.js
179 ms
designer.js
265 ms
designer-init-sprite.png
478 ms
load
539 ms
designer-sprite.png
441 ms
sprite-icons.png
439 ms
open-sans-400.woff
440 ms
open-sans-300.woff
442 ms
open-sans-600.woff
442 ms
open-sans-700.woff
441 ms
webzai-icons.woff
439 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
75 ms
3
98 ms
entries
30 ms
entries
10 ms
css
14 ms
holding.css
112 ms
modernizr.js
34 ms
jquery.min.js
166 ms
holding-logo.png
66 ms
editor.sitebuilder.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
editor.sitebuilder.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
editor.sitebuilder.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Editor.sitebuilder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Editor.sitebuilder.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
editor.sitebuilder.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Editor Sitebuilder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: